Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

The status of each project is shown on the relevant Project Definition Sheets.
Excellent Involvement
Green
Amber
Good
Significant
Strong
Disagreement
Strong
Agreement
Significant
Red
Poor
Very Poor Involvement
Figure 8: Airline Engagement Marker
BAA have allocated the status markers. On any occasion where the marker is not agreed
with the airline community this would be stated in the “Areas of Disagreement” section
of the relevant Project Definition Sheet. At the time of CIP 2009 publication no status
makers are contested 42 .
It should be noted that, in general, possible projects for Q6 have been allocated a “red”
status. HAL have done this recognising that, for this edition of CIP, such individual
possible projects have, to date, not been consulted upon for the reasons outlined
throughout this document. Therefore HAL has stated that these projects have had
below “poor” level of airline involvement, which is not strictly the case as the airline
community have agreed to the manner in which Q6 and beyond have been presented in
this document. No assessment of airline support has been included in these future
projects. This decision on status markers was made in the light of the issues regarding
Q6 and beyond detailed expansively in this document and specifically in section 2. Such
“red” status reflects HAL’s desire to be open about the status of consultation and
agreement.
42
The majority of PDS documents were shared with the CIPWG during the consultation leading
up to CIP 2009 publication. A number were however completed post that consultation. Should
the status of any of these later PDS sheets be contested HAL shall record this fact in the CIPWG
minutes.
Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP 2009 Main Document-V71-IG 50