16.10.2014 Views

Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A principal objective for any CIP publication is to set out the budgets for the proposed<br />

investment activity. CIP 2008, itself based on the CAA regulatory decision for Q5, was<br />

used by HAL to prepare project specific budgets for Q5. These budgets, known as<br />

Current Control Budgets (CCB’s) are monitored on a monthly basis and can only be<br />

adjusted via the change control process. (Refer to section 5.7 for information on change<br />

control.)<br />

CIP <strong>2009</strong> is, at its most basic level, a publication of the current state of budgets for<br />

possible investments at <strong>Heathrow</strong>. Appendix Q: Cost Schedules provides the detailed<br />

listing of project budgets while Appendix C to Appendix O inclusive shows the<br />

information against each projects via the relevant PDS.<br />

In future publications of the <strong>Heathrow</strong> CIP assumed budgets for Q6 and beyond will be<br />

shown however, until the relevant regulatory processes have been completed, such as<br />

budgets will not become fixed. A number of projects that commence in Q5 will<br />

complete in Q6. While no regulatory settlement exists for Q6, and the general<br />

preparation of a Q6 and beyond capital investment plan needs to sit within the context<br />

of the issues outlined in section 2, this publication needs to show the “roll over” nature<br />

of those Q5 projects into Q6. In order to do this the element of Anticipated Final Cost<br />

(see section 5.2.2), excluding R2 and inflation for the projects that is forecast, at<br />

February <strong>2009</strong> month end, to be incurred during Q6 is shown in Appendix Q: Cost<br />

Schedules as the Current Control Budget. I.e. for projects that start in Q5 but complete<br />

in Q6 the Q6 Anticipated Final Cost has been assumed to equal the Q6 Current Control<br />

Budget. This methodology has been adopted to allow the full cost phasing of currently<br />

planned works to be shown without prejudice to future consultation and regulatory<br />

decisions on Q6.<br />

In line with the information presented in section 5.4 HAL is using CIP <strong>2009</strong> to set Q5<br />

budgets to a “real” 2008 / 09 coat base. These budgets are those that have been<br />

arrived at by;<br />

• February <strong>2009</strong> month end data,<br />

• Change Control (see section 5.7) process, and<br />

• CIP <strong>2009</strong> inflation assumptions (refer to section 5.4).<br />

For clarity the R2 risk pot is treated as a budget for a “project” called R2. Refer to<br />

section 5.7 for further information.<br />

CIP is produced in constant prices (refer to section 5.4). However, on a monthly basis<br />

HAL presents to the CIP Working Group information on budgets including on allowance<br />

for inflation. The inflation allowance is shown as a bottom line adjustment to the<br />

individual project budgets shown in the CIP, the project budgets remain in the current<br />

CIP cost base.<br />

5.2.2 Anticipated Final Cost Information<br />

The monthly reporting that HAL undertakes with the airline community, via the CIP<br />

Working Group, focuses on performance of projects against budget. That performance<br />

is measured by viewing the Anticipated Final Cost (AFC) against the CCB.<br />

The CIP, as a budgetary document, does not present AFC information for the totality of<br />

the investment, but does, from CIP <strong>2009</strong> onwards, provide project specific AFC<br />

information in the PDS documentation.<br />

Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP <strong>2009</strong> Main Document-V71-IG 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!