16.10.2014 Views

Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

Capital Investment Plan 2009 - Heathrow Airport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Consideration of the role of consumer representation at a national and airport level;<br />

and<br />

• Valuable safeguards that the introduction of Special Administration and ring-fencing<br />

would offer for a small number of airports.<br />

On the 9 th March <strong>2009</strong> the DfT published “Reforming the framework for the economic<br />

regulation of UK airports”.<br />

This possible impacts on HAL with regard to the investment plan stated in this<br />

document for Q6 and beyond are made without prejudice to the above detailed review<br />

and any legislative or regulatory amendments that may arise as a result.<br />

The airline community have expressed 24 a desire to see consultation on future regulation<br />

issues to ensure joint understanding of the emerging issues and minimise any resultant<br />

possible ambiguity.<br />

4.3 Other Relevant Issues<br />

4.3.1 Town and Country <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />

All development is regulated by primary legislation set out in the 1990 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Act.<br />

Secondary legislation, such as the General Permitted Development Order (GPDO) 1995,<br />

further defines what types of development may require planning permission, including<br />

aviation development. Generally, any development at <strong>Heathrow</strong> involving the extension<br />

of a runway or terminal, the provision of a new terminal, or a non-operational building<br />

(i.e. not connected to the operation or function of the airport) will require planning<br />

permission in the normal manner.<br />

Any development requiring planning permission, and likely to cause a significant<br />

environmental impact, could also be subject to the Environmental Impact Assessment<br />

(EIA) process, whereby the planning application would need to be accompanied by an<br />

Environmental Statement setting out all likely significant environmental impacts arising<br />

from the development. The requirements for EIA are also set out in secondary legislation<br />

but in respect of <strong>Heathrow</strong>, only usually apply to major projects, such as substantial new<br />

stand capacity or new terminal buildings.<br />

The General Permitted Development Order (GPDO) defines what types of development<br />

at an airport can be regarded as ‘permitted development’, i.e. development not<br />

requiring planning permission. Generally, this is defined as development, undertaken by<br />

the airport operator, on operational land, required in connection with the operation of<br />

the airport. This covers most forms of airport related development, such as; new aircraft<br />

hangars, industrial and cargo buildings, multi-storey car parks, office buildings, aircraft<br />

stands, piers and satellites.<br />

Although ‘permitted development’ does not require planning permission, there is a<br />

requirement to consult the planning authority, which means following the same process<br />

as a planning application, albeit that the planning authority cannot refuse approval for<br />

the development. This does not however prevent the planning authority from objecting<br />

to specific developments and, in extreme cases, the planning authority could request the<br />

Secretary of State to remove Hal’s permitted development rights should there be a clear<br />

abuse of it’s powers in this respect. There is also the possibility that any permitted<br />

development over 1ha in site area, and likely to cause a significant environmental<br />

24<br />

At the Special CIPWG held 27 th February <strong>2009</strong>.<br />

Internal File Name: 0903XX-CIP <strong>2009</strong> Main Document-V71-IG 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!