23.03.2017 Views

wilamowski-b-m-irwin-j-d-industrial-communication-systems-2011

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8-12 Industrial Communication Systems<br />

initializations would fail. Every tag will then wait for a randomly determined duration in accordance<br />

with the predetermined anticollision scheme before trying again. The most common standard used in<br />

the air interface at 860–960.MHz is ISO/IEC 18000 Part 6.<br />

8.15 Vicinity Card<br />

In layman’s terminology, a <strong>communication</strong>s link in backscattering is established by modifying the environment<br />

for wave scattering. A longer range results because the current responsible for the backscattered<br />

wave is as strong as the current induced by the incident wave. In principle, a similar technique<br />

could be used to extend the range of coverage due to inductive coupling. Using energy drawn from<br />

inductive coupling, the microprocessor in a passive HF RFID tag could be instructed to load or short<br />

the secondary coil in accordance with the data streams to be sent [17]. As a result of the physical change<br />

in the secondary inductor, the coupling coefficient is affected correspondingly. It then follows that the<br />

driving source of the primary coil would detect a small yet apprehensible change in the input impedance,<br />

and as a result, a <strong>communication</strong>s link is established. Based on the ISO 15693 standard, the effective<br />

range of a HD RFID could be extended beyond 1 meter. To distinguish it from the conventional HF<br />

RFID, it is called a vicinity card.<br />

Although mutual inductors are used in both cases, migration from HF RFID to vicinity card is not<br />

simple. Of course, the computer network and the associated software could be reused with minor modifications,<br />

but the readers and tags must be replaced. Thus, existing users of HF RFID <strong>systems</strong> will be confronted<br />

with the dilemma on choosing between a familiar HF system or a versatile one at a different frequency.<br />

8.16 Frequency Selection<br />

Since backscattering is frequency independent, the next step in the design of a long-range passive<br />

RFID system is the selection of a frequency for operation. It is a tall order for the spectrum regulator<br />

because finding a vacant frequency slot in the one-and-only-one spectrum for an approved wireless<br />

usage requires a comprehensive knowledge of the technology itself, the trend of development, and an<br />

appreciation of the urgent socioeconomic needs on the one hand, and on the other, a regulator needs<br />

to command an excellent political skill in balancing the technical and socioeconomic factors subtly<br />

with little discretionary leverage.<br />

While socioeconomic issues will be discussed later, the easier one is first addressed. Technically, the<br />

issues of concern are range of coverage, physical constraints, scope of application, speed of data transmission,<br />

electromagnetic compatibility, environmental friendliness, intersystem and intrasystem interferences,<br />

product safety, and cost of production.<br />

For long-range operations, an efficient antenna is needed in a tag. Hence, microwave RFID is<br />

preferred as room is available for accommodating the 30.mm half-wave antenna on the covering box<br />

of most products. Having said that, UHF RFID is a strong alternative because its antenna could be<br />

shortened to less than 30.mm by slow-wave techniques, and further shrinkage could be achieved by<br />

fabricating the patch antenna on a dense substrate. Nonetheless, it is a choice between a UHF and<br />

a microwave.<br />

On the scope of applications, UHF prevails because dry wood, an RF-lucent material at ultrahigh frequencies,<br />

would become RF absorbent at microwave frequencies. This change has a steep consequence as<br />

wood is one of the key materials used in making pallets for the logistics industry. Moreover, UHF wins<br />

again on cost-effectiveness because the technologies used in making radio frequency–integrated circuits<br />

(RFIC) are more mature; therefore, a 900.MHz die is much cheaper than its counterpart at 2450.MHz.<br />

Most important of all, UHF has a clear edge on intersystem electromagnetic interference. As a result<br />

of the migration of mobile phone subscribers to the 2¾ generation at 1800.MHz and the third generation<br />

at 2000.MHz, a relatively clean environment is found in the UHF band as some of the slots allocated for<br />

the second generation at 900.MHz have been underutilized for a long time. On the other hand, traffic<br />

© <strong>2011</strong> by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!