23.03.2017 Views

wilamowski-b-m-irwin-j-d-industrial-communication-systems-2011

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Protocols in Power Generation 29-3<br />

over the whole installation. These <strong>systems</strong> are connected to the plant control room through intra-plant<br />

<strong>communication</strong> infrastructure. In the following paragraphs, examples of intra-plant <strong>communication</strong> in<br />

nuclear power generation automation <strong>systems</strong> are presented because they have numerous and specific<br />

requirements comparing to other power generation technologies.<br />

29.2.1 Example of Nuclear Power Plant Automation Systems<br />

In a nuclear power plant, there are, as in fossil fuel power plant, several automation <strong>systems</strong> (Figure 29.3):<br />

turbine control, boiler control, core protection control, switchyard control, and other dedicated control<br />

<strong>systems</strong> (chemical processing, air conditioning, etc.).<br />

The difference with fossil fuel power plants is the mandatory high safety level. For example, the core<br />

protection control system must be designed for this purpose following very strong design rules, whereas<br />

the safety requirements on the boiler control system authorized the use of commercial off-the-shelf control<br />

system if it fulfills the requirements on its class of <strong>systems</strong>. The other control <strong>systems</strong> (turbine and<br />

switchyard) are often provided by the corresponding system manufacturers and they are not concerned<br />

by nuclear-specific safety requirements.<br />

The global automation <strong>systems</strong>, which are designed to interact with the operators in the control room,<br />

are particularly concerned by the safety design rules. These <strong>systems</strong> involve control functions from level<br />

0 to level 2 as shown in Figure 29.2. In the following paragraph, the nuclear safety design rules of automation<br />

system will be detailed.<br />

29.2.2 Safety Requirements and System Classifications<br />

(IEC 61226, F1A, F1B, F2)<br />

Safety requirements in nuclear power generation concern many <strong>systems</strong>. There are strong design rules<br />

on the automation <strong>systems</strong> and particularly on the <strong>communication</strong> sub<strong>systems</strong> that are included in<br />

the core protection control <strong>systems</strong>. The required characteristics of the <strong>communication</strong> sub<strong>systems</strong> are<br />

determinism, redundancy, functional and technical diversity, and fault tolerance. Moreover, the functional<br />

architecture of the global control <strong>systems</strong> must comply with the system classification rules that<br />

TXS<br />

SPPA T2000<br />

Conventional<br />

technology<br />

Specific technology<br />

Backup<br />

operation<br />

system<br />

Main<br />

operation<br />

system<br />

Standard I&C<br />

Technical premises of crisis<br />

Synoptic view<br />

Backup panel<br />

Level 2<br />

RCSL<br />

reactor<br />

control<br />

Core I&C<br />

PS<br />

reactor<br />

protection<br />

SAS (safety<br />

automation<br />

system)<br />

PACS<br />

Main automation <strong>systems</strong><br />

Standard I&C<br />

PAS (process<br />

automation<br />

system)<br />

PACS<br />

TPCS<br />

Turbine I&C<br />

Turbine & generator I&C<br />

Level 1<br />

Grappes de<br />

contröle<br />

Actuators<br />

F1A<br />

Actuators<br />

F1A<br />

Actuator<br />

F1B<br />

Sensors<br />

F1B<br />

Actuator F2<br />

et NC<br />

Sensors F2<br />

et NC<br />

Level 0<br />

FIGURE 29.3<br />

Example of core protection control system.<br />

© <strong>2011</strong> by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!