23.03.2017 Views

wilamowski-b-m-irwin-j-d-industrial-communication-systems-2011

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Communications in Medical Applications 30-13<br />

30.6.3 Standardization<br />

Standardization promotes the avoidance of duplicate research efforts, the improvement of technical<br />

support, an increased volume production leading to a reduced per item cost, a broadening of the application<br />

market, etc. To harness these benefits in healthcare environments, specific protocols addressing<br />

interoperable bedside devices (ISO/IEEE 11073 [53]) and BANs (IEEE 802.15.6 [54]) have been proposed.<br />

The ISO/IEEE 11073 family of standards specifies the nomenclature, the abstract data model, the<br />

service model, and the transport for interoperable bedside devices and aims to “provide real-time plugand-play<br />

interoperability for patient-connected medical devices and facilitate the efficient exchange of<br />

vital signs and medical device data, acquired at the point-of-care, in all health care environments” [56].<br />

Currently, only two transport <strong>systems</strong> have been approved: cable connected and infrared wireless.<br />

However, an approved draft version of a set of guidelines for the use of RF wireless technology as transport<br />

in ISO/IEEE 11073 <strong>systems</strong> is available since June 2008.<br />

In the latter part of 2007, the IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6 (BAN) was formed to develop a <strong>communication</strong><br />

standard optimized for low-power devices operating in (or around) the human body (but not<br />

limited to humans), addressing medical healthcare applications (e.g., physiological monitoring), consumer<br />

electronics including entertainment (e.g., wireless headphone), and other applications. Besides<br />

the unique criteria defined by Task Group 6 [58], issues regarding candidate wireless technologies have<br />

been introduced [57]. However, a draft ready for the sponsor ballot is only scheduled for the end of 2009,<br />

which will significantly delay the standard adoption.<br />

Although not specifically designed envisaging healthcare environments, the IEEE 1451 [52] has the<br />

potential to become a contender in medical monitoring applications. This standard was initially sponsored<br />

by the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society and targets <strong>industrial</strong> wired and wireless<br />

distributed monitoring and control applications. The IEEE 1451 family of standards defines a set of open,<br />

common, network-independent <strong>communication</strong> interfaces for connecting transducers (sensors or actuators)<br />

to microprocessors, instrumentation <strong>systems</strong>, and control/field networks [55]. Smart transducer<br />

interfaces for sensors (and actuators) employing wireless <strong>communication</strong> protocols (Wi-Fi, ZigBee,<br />

Bluetooth, and LoWPAN) are standardized since 2007 and are already commercially available [59].<br />

Despite the existence of standards specifically addressing <strong>communication</strong>s among medical devices in<br />

healthcare environments, commercial modules supporting those standards are still scarce, thus hindering<br />

their application in real deployments. Also, standards should be designed to reduce feature redundancy<br />

and incompatibility, which would foster interoperability.<br />

30.6.4 timeliness<br />

The occurrence of high delays and jitter in medical <strong>communication</strong> <strong>systems</strong> has a direct impact on<br />

the quality of service provided by the associated equipment. For example, a varying (high) latency in<br />

real-time patient vital sign <strong>communication</strong> can interfere with computerized and human interpretation,<br />

increasing the probability of misdiagnosis and risking therapeutic interventions. Moreover, delays<br />

can originate spurious alarms, such as “lead-loss” or “offline patient,” which reduce system trust and<br />

increase complaints (and investigations) for “no-problem-found” events.<br />

Because security and privacy are main requirements in healthcare <strong>communication</strong>s, the use of standard<br />

encryption mechanisms is highly desirable as it allows securing data and guaranteeing compatibility<br />

and continuous improvement of the technology. However, since most medical devices embed small power<br />

microprocessors, the delay associated with the encryption/decryption procedure can be significant.<br />

Many of the aforementioned medical <strong>communication</strong>s employed in localization, monitoring, and<br />

automation applications have not been fully assessed, i.e., standard protocols are employed for data<br />

<strong>communication</strong> without any experimental or theoretical evaluation of latency and jitter. This approach<br />

is inadequate and highly censurable for medical applications with safety-critical real-time <strong>communication</strong><br />

requirements.<br />

© <strong>2011</strong> by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!