23.03.2017 Views

wilamowski-b-m-irwin-j-d-industrial-communication-systems-2011

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Virtual Automation Networks 15-9<br />

15.4 Maintenance of the Runtime Tunnel Based<br />

on Quality- of-Service Monitoring and Provider Switching<br />

To use a heterogeneous network for the exchange of application data in the automation domain, the<br />

following requirements have to be fulfilled:<br />

• Non-interrupted availability<br />

• Guarantee of the desired safety integrity level to protect the human life/health as well as the assets<br />

[AW08]<br />

• Automation-specific security measures by the reasons of overall safety [AW08,WA08]<br />

• Suitable real-time behavior for geographically distributed automation applications that can be<br />

offered by the used transmission technology [BZ08,RL08]<br />

Since the aspects of safety and security have been described in several chapters of this handbook, only<br />

the aspect of availability should be discussed here in the context of using WAN.<br />

Besides a suiting service level agreement (SLA—the contract with the provider), the main VAN mechanisms<br />

to guarantee the availability of an end-to-end <strong>communication</strong> within the heterogeneous network,<br />

especially regarding WANs, are<br />

• Monitoring the actual behavior of the selected <strong>communication</strong> path through the WAN [WM08];<br />

from the monitoring results, a VAN switching can be derived<br />

• VAN switching between providers or suitable transmission technologies that are configured in<br />

the VAN device <strong>communication</strong> properties<br />

• VAN priority mapping (mapping of the priorities of the tunneled packets to the tunnel packets)<br />

In contrast to a local automation network, where the entire transmission behavior can be completely<br />

controlled, this is extremely limited in public WANs. Here, the end user has very little technical<br />

possibilities to influence the behavior of the transmission channel. The detailed infrastructure<br />

composition and therefore the exact <strong>communication</strong> path cannot be described in end-to-end detail<br />

(see Figure 15.8). The <strong>communication</strong> path is also subject to temporary changes and is often even not<br />

known by the service provider himself. The quality of the line is contractually determined by an SLA<br />

with the provider. In the SLA, parameters are defined such as bandwidth, delays, fluctuation range,<br />

availability, priority classes, data loss rate, etc. Besides those quantitative technical aspects also organizational<br />

items as service hours, reaction times on problems, responsibilities, and escalation scenarios.<br />

Sometimes, incentive awards for service levels exceeded and usually penalty provisions for unprovided<br />

services are defined.<br />

A 100% availability cannot be guaranteed, a usual contract value is about 98%. Also, 99.5% is possible,<br />

but at the moment, this is too expensive for a broad use in respective automation applications.<br />

Transmission<br />

capabilities<br />

Resulting<br />

transmission<br />

capability<br />

Network 1 Network 2<br />

n × segments<br />

FIGURE 15.8<br />

End-to-end path capabilities in a chain of segments.<br />

© <strong>2011</strong> by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!