23.03.2017 Views

wilamowski-b-m-irwin-j-d-industrial-communication-systems-2011

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Industrial Ethernet 37-5<br />

Advantage: Provides deterministic guaranties and hard real-time performances<br />

Drawback: Uses specific network devices and specific stations; cannot coexist with other Industrial<br />

Ethernet and standard Ethernet stations<br />

Examples: EtherCAT, SERCOS III<br />

37.3 Standardized Solutions of IEC 61158 and IEC 61784<br />

Industrial Ethernet profiles have been included in the IEC 61158 standard (Industrial <strong>communication</strong><br />

networks—Fieldbus specifications) and IEC 61784 (Industrial <strong>communication</strong> networks—Profiles).<br />

Indeed, except EtherCAT and Ethernet Powerlink, Industrial Ethernet profiles are added to existing<br />

profile families (or CPF for Communication Profile Families). In this standard, a profile (or CP for<br />

Communication Profile) is defined as a set of all-layer specifications while a family is a set of profile with<br />

similar application layers.<br />

Under the promise of better interoperability, 16 different Industrial Ethernet profiles are standardized<br />

grouped in 11 families in IEC 61158 [1–6] and IEC 61784 [7–9], which are not more interoperable<br />

than their ancestors, fieldbuses.<br />

The Table 37.1, extracted from IEC 61158-1 [1], synthesizes all the <strong>industrial</strong> <strong>communication</strong> profiles<br />

standardized in IEC 61158 and 61784. The Industrial Ethernet solutions are outlined in red.<br />

Among these Industrial Ethernet, ProfiNet* is detailed in Chapter 40, EtherCAT in Chapter 38,<br />

Ethernet Powerlink in Chapter 39, and Modbus in Chapter 36.<br />

Before synthesizing the main features of standardized solutions, the ones not detailed in other chapters<br />

of this section are briefly described.<br />

37.3.1 EtherNet/IP<br />

EtherNet/IP [18] is a <strong>communication</strong> standard supported by Open DeviceNet Vendor Association<br />

(ODVA) and ControlNet International Association. As DeviceNet and ControlNet, EtherNet/IP uses a<br />

messaging Common Industrial Protocol (CIP). This protocol is supported by Rockwell and Schneider<br />

Electric. While ControlNet sets (in IEC 61158 part 6) to support its own messaging and DeviceNet uses<br />

CAN as a carrier, EtherNet/IP stack uses Ethernet/TCP/IP as a means of transporting CIP messaging.<br />

CIP is the higher layer protocol and is based on object-oriented approach. It defines objects for the messaging<br />

application and objects to describe the devices.<br />

The use of CIP messaging provides, in addition to the CIP team model, a set of features including<br />

• CIPsync, which allows synchronizing clocks of network equipments to the milliseconds<br />

and is based on the standard IEC 61588 protocol that defines the Precision Time Protocol<br />

(PTP) [10]<br />

• CIPSafety, which is an upper layer for functional security for CIP applications, standardized in<br />

the IEC 61784–3 [9]<br />

Ethernet/IP provides<br />

• Services for cyclic exchanges of variables, called implicit transfers, based on multi-cast traffic in<br />

UDP/IP<br />

• Services to exchange event-based messages, called explicit transfers, based on TCP/IP traffic<br />

The event-based messages over TCP/IP are used both for transmission of system information (configuration<br />

and diagnostic operation) and for information in applications that do not require fast response<br />

times.<br />

* The classes listed in the standard (CC-A, CC-B, and CC-C) do not correspond to the real-time profiles ProfiNet RT,<br />

or IRT, but are conformance classes reporting to the scope of functions needed.<br />

© <strong>2011</strong> by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!