23.03.2017 Views

wilamowski-b-m-irwin-j-d-industrial-communication-systems-2011

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ISO/OSI Model 1-3<br />

Application<br />

Operating system<br />

Communication<br />

FIGURE 1.2<br />

Location of the <strong>communication</strong> system in a device.<br />

<strong>communication</strong> protocols. While on one hand, there should be only a few different protocols to meet<br />

the requirements of the standard (i.e., little variation, lots of common properties), on the other hand, we<br />

need a lot of different protocols to meet the different requirements.<br />

Today, we see that most fieldbus protocols in <strong>industrial</strong> automation consist of at most three layers;<br />

building automation protocols usually have more layers. The LonTalk protocol [Loy 05] (ANSI/CEA<br />

709.1 and ISO/IEC 14908-1) even implements all seven layers.<br />

1.2 Open Standard<br />

The term “open system” is well defined in ISO: a “system” is in this context a complete facility (unit), that<br />

is, computers (like process computers) and data processing machines with peripheral devices like storage,<br />

front-end computers, data stations, or application software. Such a system contains <strong>communication</strong><br />

partners and (parts of) a <strong>communication</strong> system.<br />

The term “open” has a stricter meaning than as it is used in common language, and cannot be used<br />

freely in the area of <strong>communication</strong>s (even if marketing wants to interpret it differently). A system is<br />

“open,” if it meets certain requirements. The first authoritative requirement is that the protocol is officially<br />

standardized (nationally or internationally). A quasi-standard or a special standard defined by a<br />

company is not valid. In such a way, the distribution (publication) is guaranteed—which shall ensure<br />

equal opportunities between companies.<br />

In 1997, the different European committees struggled hard to define the requirement how the term<br />

may be interpreted. CEN and CENELEC agree that—in accordance with the reference model—a system is<br />

open, if the protocols have been opened (i.e., standardized) and are not protected by a patent that prevents<br />

competitors to design the same protocol. Licenses have to be available for everyone at “reasonable” prices.<br />

The ISO/OSI reference model describes functions, not hardware or software. It does not dictate<br />

manufacturers which technology to use in their products. It only prescribes how the technology has to<br />

behave, seen from the outside.<br />

Unfortunately, the standard for a protocol cannot be compared with a physical unit like a screw.<br />

A standard is complex and thus never completely error free. This was considered regarding different<br />

terms. Two <strong>systems</strong> are called interconnectable, if they are subject to the same standard. This does,<br />

however, not mean that they cooperate. If cooperation shall be guaranteed, interworkability is required,<br />

which means that the system can in principle exchange data according to the protocol. However, the<br />

© <strong>2011</strong> by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!