18.12.2012 Views

Von: BueschelW@web.de im Auftrag von Wolfgang Bueschel ...

Von: BueschelW@web.de im Auftrag von Wolfgang Bueschel ...

Von: BueschelW@web.de im Auftrag von Wolfgang Bueschel ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

This transmitters used a self-radiating 51 m mast as antenna.<br />

Since 1998 the main transmitter for 783 kHz, which three years later<br />

became the only one at all, is a Thomson M2W that sits in the original<br />

FM/VHF transmitter building. See at bottom of<br />

<br />

... which in<strong>de</strong>ed provi<strong>de</strong>s about the best possible views, the sight is<br />

basically just that of some metal plates, with the air vents being the<br />

only clear indication that this *is* the transmitter. A new antenna has<br />

been provi<strong>de</strong>d with the M2W, very s<strong>im</strong>ilar to the now removed ones of the<br />

old transmitters:<br />

<br />

These antennas are an East German staple, but I never saw them on photos<br />

of transmitter sites abroad, with the only exception being the Koepenickbuilt<br />

Pleven in Bulgaria. Any comments on this aspect?<br />

Besi<strong>de</strong>s this the M2W can also use the above mentioned 51 m mast at reduced<br />

power of 20 kW, which is what this standard <strong>de</strong>sign permits. This happens<br />

not too seldom, just every t<strong>im</strong>e work on the main antenna takes place.<br />

Perhaps you remember that Mittel<strong>de</strong>utscher Rundfunk <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d in 1995 to use<br />

783 instead of 531 kHz from Wie<strong>de</strong>rau. 531 was a very good dayt<strong>im</strong>e<br />

frequency, one would have guessed rather 300 than 100 kW for it. 783 is<br />

noticeably poorer, and at night things become really bad. Perhaps you<br />

remember my reports about a 1 kHz het, which turned out to originate from<br />

Syria. Just 90 km away from a 100 kW station! Of course the DCC system<br />

does not help by making such interferences more prominent, lacking the<br />

full carrier in pauses, but still quite some people think that MDR should<br />

better have rid<strong>de</strong>n out the Beromuenster co-channel situation, since now<br />

this problem would have been evaporated.<br />

For FM/TV see<br />

<br />

At top the current FM transmitters in the former UHF building, below the<br />

test cards the TV transmitters that have now all been removed.<br />

In the pre-1990 era most FM/TV equipment originated from Funkwerk<br />

Koepenick, plus some own construction, plus some ad<strong>de</strong>d Zarat (Poland)<br />

equipment. Feeds came in via microwave (in place for TV anyway), also for<br />

the MW/SW transmissions, with cable connections being only a back-up.<br />

(Kai Ludwig-D, dxld March 20)<br />

SWR-cont.ra hat <strong>de</strong>n Mittelwellensen<strong>de</strong>r Ulm (Jungingen) <strong>von</strong> 711 nach 1413<br />

kHz verlegt. Die alte Frequenz wur<strong>de</strong> am 8. Maerz 2010 abeschaltet, die<br />

neue am 10. Maerz 2010, 09.30 Uhr, in Betrieb genommen. Zugleich wur<strong>de</strong> die<br />

Sen<strong>de</strong>leistung auf 1 kW reduziert. Die SWR-Mitteilung verspricht <strong>de</strong>n Ulmern<br />

"einen <strong>de</strong>utlich besseren Empfang", doch die Frage ist nun, wie sich die<br />

neue Ulmer Frequenz 1413 kHz neben <strong>de</strong>n starken Signalen <strong>de</strong>r<br />

file:///E|/datentransfer/wwdfxc_2010/BCDX958.TXT[06.01.2011 12:39:01]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!