18.12.2012 Views

Von: BueschelW@web.de im Auftrag von Wolfgang Bueschel ...

Von: BueschelW@web.de im Auftrag von Wolfgang Bueschel ...

Von: BueschelW@web.de im Auftrag von Wolfgang Bueschel ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SW TXsite Jan 20)<br />

<br />

In this week's Talking Point we examine the future of shortwave<br />

broadcasting. Shortwave has undoubtedly been on the retreat in <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

countries, forced to share its former pr<strong>im</strong>acy with upstart mediums such<br />

as the internet and satellite radio. But are its days numbered even in<br />

the <strong>de</strong>veloping world.<br />

The topic for this week's Talking Point is one that is close to home for<br />

the staff of Radio Prague and for a large number of its listeners. It is<br />

the future of shortwave. Shortwave is our main broadcast medium with<br />

feedback from listeners suggesting that this is the way we reach around<br />

half of you.<br />

But shortwave transmission has also been one of the station's main costs,<br />

representing 13 million crowns out of a budget of just un<strong>de</strong>r 65 million<br />

crowns last year [that means 20% of the total budget ... that's not too<br />

much, I guess, wb.]. And with <strong>de</strong>mands from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs<br />

for severe cutbacks, the whole future of shortwave broadcasting by Radio<br />

Prague has been un<strong>de</strong>r threat.<br />

Station director Miroslav Krupicka <strong>de</strong>scribes the latest situation.<br />

"Radio Prague's budget for this year has been reduced by 15.0 percent. It<br />

is a little bit more than we expected but we have to come to terms with<br />

it. It still makes it possible for us to continue shortwave broadcasts.<br />

What we have to do is to close one[!] of the two[!] short wave<br />

transmitters that we have in Litomysl. We will be able to cover basically<br />

more or less the same territory we have been covering so far, which means<br />

the whole of Europe, North Africa, let's say the Middle East and parts of<br />

North and South America. We won't be reducing very much the area that we<br />

cover so far."<br />

Those economy measures almost halve the shortwave transmission bill<br />

to 7.0 million crowns a year. [...]<br />

"Major broadcasters like the BBC have actually stopped broadcasting to<br />

Europe on shortwave along with France. Denmark and Norway have gone off<br />

the air, as has Austria and Slovakia. The list goes on and on. There are a<br />

lot of transmitter facilities that are at the moment standing idle. And<br />

frankly I do not think they will ever come back to the glory that we knew<br />

say 20 to 25 years ago."<br />

He adds that one of shortwave's main problems is its expense. "In terms of<br />

short wave broadcasting, you need huge powers - electricity costs - in<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r to make just one signal. And if you are spending hundreds of dollars<br />

to keep a 100 or 250 kW shortwave radio transmitter on the air, that may<br />

have been physically possible 10 years ago when oil was 50$ a barrel but<br />

when it becomes 100$ a barrel it becomes a very, very expensive way of<br />

sharing an i<strong>de</strong>a."<br />

But Radio Prague's Mr. Krupicka believes shortwave still has a major role,<br />

especially in those parts of the world where the internet has not advanced<br />

so far and so fast.<br />

file:///E|/datentransfer/wwdfxc_2010/BCDX948.TXT[06.01.2011 12:38:08]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!