17.06.2022 Views

Language Contact and Documentation: Contacto Linguistico y Documentacion

por Bernard Comrie y Lucia Golluscio

por Bernard Comrie y Lucia Golluscio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

326 Ulrike Mosel<br />

5 Four types of syntactic changes<br />

The syntactic changes made by the editors can be grouped into four types of<br />

change:<br />

1. Linkage of paratactic clauses (§ 5.1)<br />

1.1. linkage by cross-clausal dependency without embedding (chained Tail-<br />

Head linkage, adjoined adverbial clauses)<br />

1.2. integration by embedding (relative clause constructions)<br />

1.3. interlacing by raising in complement constructions<br />

2. Compression of two paratactic clauses into one clause (§ 5.2) by<br />

2.1. serial verb constructions<br />

2.2. nominalisations<br />

2.3. ditransitive constructions<br />

3. Decompression: resolution of complex constructions into paratactic constructions<br />

(§ 5.3)<br />

4. Elaboration: addition of words, phrases, clauses (§ 5.4)<br />

The description of clause linkage (§ 5.1) <strong>and</strong> compression (§ 5.2) follows to<br />

some extent Lehmann’s typology of clause linkage (Lehmann 1985). While<br />

§ 5.1 describes how a sequence of two independent clauses is changed into a<br />

complex sentence, § 5.2 shows three kinds of syntactic change that merge two<br />

paratactic clauses into a single clause. The third type of change described in<br />

§ 5.3 is the opposite of the others as it resolves complex sentences into a sequence<br />

of paratactic clauses. This shows that the changes made by editors are<br />

not unidirectional from simple to more complex constructions. I do not know<br />

why the editors made these changes because I was afraid that any questions<br />

about their style of writing could be misunderstood as criticism <strong>and</strong> intimidate<br />

them. The last type of change described here is elaboration which often results<br />

in one of the other syntactic changes.<br />

5.1 Linkage of paratactic clauses<br />

Paratactic clauses are either joined by juxtaposition or by the conjunctions me<br />

‘<strong>and</strong>’ or re ‘<strong>and</strong> then, so that, in order to’.<br />

5.1.1 Cross-clausal dependency without embedding: Tail-Head constructions<br />

So-called Tail-Head Linkage is widely attested in Oceanic <strong>and</strong> Papuan languages<br />

(Dixon 1988: 307, Mosel 1984: 124, Thieberger 2006: 327 f., Vries 2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!