the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

Sect. li] Introduct'ton 65
them, wliich is indeed possible : see my edition of the Test. XII
Patriarchs, pp. 39-40. Whence 42 is drawn is a difficulty. But
returning to the two sources above-mentioned, we might assign to
the ' Son of Man ' source and the angelic interpreter—' the angel
who went with me.'
403-^
46-48''.
523-4.
613-*.
62^-63.
692C-29_
70-71.
And to the source dealing with the Elect One arid the angelic
interpreter—' the angel of peace.'
38-39.
401-2, 8-10_
411-2, 9_
45.
488-io_
50-521-2. s-o,
53-54".
653-57.
gll-2, S-13_
62'.
The above analysis of the sources can of course only be provisional
until the Greek version of the original is recovered. The second
source differs from the former in recognizing the judgement of the
sword, 38', 48*"^", and the attack of the hostile Gentiles on
Jerusalem, 56, the progressive conversion of the Gentiles who had
no part in oppressing Israel, 50""*, and the triumphant return of
the Dispersion, 57. 553-573"' looks like an independent source
adapted to a new context. There is no hint of the judgement of
the sword in the first source.
These two sources had much material in common. 52^-^ apparently
belonged to both in some form. The Elect One and the Son of Man
alike judge the kings and the mighty, and the same attributes are
to a great extent ascribed to each, save that of pre-existence, which^
as it happens, is attributed only to the Son of Man, 48^ sqq,
B. Relation of 37-71 to the rest of the book. As all critics
are now agreed that the Parables are distinct in -origin from the
1370 r