02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xxxiv The Booh <strong>of</strong> Enoch,<br />

VoLKMAR, ' Beitrage zur Erklarung des Buches H<strong>enoch</strong><br />

{Zeitsch: D. M. G., xiv. 1860, pp. 87-134, 296) :<br />

'Einige Bemer-<br />

kungen iiber Apokalyptik' {Zeitsclir .<br />

f. w. Theol., iv. 1861, pp. 111-<br />

136) :<br />

' Ueber die katholisehen Briefe und H<strong>enoch</strong> ' (iv. 1861,<br />

pp. 422-436 ; V. 1862, pp. 46-75). As Hilgenfeld reckoned <strong>the</strong><br />

periods <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Seventy Shepherds at seven years each, starting<br />

from 588 b. c, and thus arrived at 98 b. c, Volkmar started<br />

from <strong>the</strong> same anterior limit and reckoned each period at ten<br />

years. He thus found <strong>the</strong> entire rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shepherds to last<br />

700 years or, through certain refinements, peculiarly Volkmarian,<br />

720 years, and so arrived at <strong>the</strong> year <strong>of</strong> Barcochab's rebellion<br />

A. D. 132—a year which has exercised a strange fascination over<br />

him and has been fatal to his reputation as a critic. Thus Enoch<br />

was written 132 b. c. It was <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> a disciple <strong>of</strong> Akiba, and<br />

was designed to announce <strong>the</strong> final victory <strong>of</strong> Bareochab. Volkmar<br />

restated his <strong>the</strong>ory in an essaj^: Eine Neutestamentliche Ent-<br />

deckung, Ziirich, 1862. His views have received more attention<br />

than <strong>the</strong>y deserved through <strong>the</strong> rejoinders <strong>of</strong> Hilgenfeld, Dill-<br />

mann, Langen, Sieffert, Gebhardt, Drummond, and Stanton.<br />

Geiger, JildiscJie ZeitscJir. f. Wmensch. und Lehen, 1864-1865,<br />

pp. 196-204. This article deals mainly with <strong>the</strong> Calendar in<br />

Enoch. I have adopted one <strong>of</strong> his suggestions in 10*.<br />

Langen, Das Jitdenthum in Palddina, 1866, pp. 35-64.<br />

Langen regards Enoch as an early but highly composite work<br />

put toge<strong>the</strong>r in its present form about 160 B.C. (pp. 36, 64), and<br />

emanating from orthodox and patriotic Judaism as a protest<br />

against hea<strong>the</strong>n religion and philosophy.<br />

SiEFEERT, Be apocryphi lihri H<strong>enoch</strong>i origine et argumento,<br />

Begimonti, 1867. Sieffert (p. 3) takes <strong>the</strong> groundwork to be<br />

1-16 20-36 72-82 91-105, written by a Chasid in <strong>the</strong> age<br />

<strong>of</strong> Simon <strong>the</strong> Maccabee (pp. 11-13) : 83-90 is a later addition<br />

about <strong>the</strong> year 108 b. c, and 17-19 37-71 106-108 are <strong>of</strong> Essene<br />

origin and composed before 64 b. c. (pp. 27-29).<br />

202.<br />

HoLTZMANN, GescUcUe des f'olkes Israel, 1867, vol. ii, pp. 201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!