02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sect. II] Chapters L. S—LL 1 99<br />

And Sheol also shall give back that which it has received,<br />

Eetribution in O.T.,' Oct. 1890, 1-12<br />

Charles, Eschatology, Sebrew, Jewish,<br />

and Christian, 1899 (see Index). The<br />

various forms in which <strong>the</strong> Jewish<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrection appeared<br />

are : (1) a resurrection <strong>of</strong> all Israelites.<br />

This doctrine is first taught in Dan. 12^;<br />

but, though so powerfully attested, it<br />

did not become <strong>the</strong> prevailing belief.<br />

It is <strong>the</strong> accepted faith in 1 En. 1-36<br />

(with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> one class <strong>of</strong><br />

sinners in 2213) 37.70 83-90 Ps. 65<br />

(title) in LXX 2 Mace. 7'. ". 2=. "s, so<br />

12", " compared with 6^8 2 Bar. 30<br />

50-51'. (2) A resurrection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

righteous Israelites. In post-Exilic Is.<br />

25' 2613 pgg. 1610, 11 1715 4915 7324-27<br />

(cf. Cheyne, Oyigin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Psalter,<br />

406-408) Job I4IS-I6 1926, 27 1 En. 91-<br />

104 Pss. Sol. 3" 133 14' 1515; Josephua,<br />

Ant. xviii. 1. 3 ; Bell. Jad. ii. 8. 14.<br />

That <strong>the</strong>. resurrection was <strong>the</strong> sole<br />

prerogative <strong>of</strong> righteous Israelites,<br />

became <strong>the</strong> accepted doctrine in Tal-<br />

mudio <strong>the</strong>ology : Weber, Jiid. Tlieol.<br />

390-391. Individual voices, how-<br />

ever, are not wanting, who asserted<br />

<strong>the</strong> resurrection <strong>of</strong> pious Gentiles,<br />

Eisenmenger, EntdecMes Jiidenthum,<br />

908, 909 :<br />

indeed, that <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> Gentiles,<br />

with some few exceptions, but only to<br />

die again, op. cit. 908-910; Weber, 391.<br />

Even imperfect Israelites could attain<br />

to this resurrection <strong>of</strong> life after purgation<br />

in Gehenna, Weber, 391. (3) A<br />

resurrection <strong>of</strong> all mankind, 4 Ezra<br />

752. " Test. XII Patriarch. Benj. 10«-8.<br />

Concurrently with <strong>the</strong> above forms <strong>of</strong><br />

doctrine, o<strong>the</strong>r Jews believed only in<br />

<strong>the</strong> immortality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> soul : Wisd. 31 ''i-<br />

47 516 §20 compared with 91s 15' Jub.<br />

23^". 1. The earth also ... received.<br />

So y save that for mahdanta<br />

(5, /3) = ' that which has been entrusted<br />

to it ' it substitutes a gloss = ' those<br />

who are treasured up in it ', t»<br />

are defective '<br />

; Sheol shall give back<br />

that which has been entrusted to it,<br />

;<br />

that which it has received." i8 has a<br />

conflate text based partly on <strong>the</strong> ori-<br />

ginal <strong>of</strong> g and ontu: ' <strong>the</strong> earth shall<br />

give back that which has been en-<br />

trusted to it, and Sheol shall give back<br />

that which has been entrusted to it,<br />

H 3<br />

that which it has received.' Cf.<br />

4 Ezra 7'^ 'Et terra reddet qui in ea<br />

dormiunt, et pulvis qui in eo silentio<br />

habitant, et prumptuaria reddent quae<br />

eis commendatae sunt animae' Our<br />

text is quoted in <strong>the</strong> Ps. Philo Liber<br />

bibl. Antiquifatum, an old Jewish work<br />

written originally in Hebrew soon after<br />

A.D. 70 but preserved only in Latin. It<br />

was printed thrice in <strong>the</strong> sixteenth centmy.<br />

See Snci/c. Brit.'^^ ii. 178. The<br />

earth gives up <strong>the</strong> body just as Sheol<br />

and Abaddon give up <strong>the</strong> soul. They<br />

are both reunited at <strong>the</strong> resurrection.<br />

The raising <strong>of</strong> both was subsequently<br />

justified in Sanh, 91* (Lev. E. iv)<br />

on <strong>the</strong> ground that <strong>the</strong> soul and body<br />

could respectively plead <strong>the</strong>ir inno-<br />

cence on <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> judgement in<br />

that nei<strong>the</strong>r had sinned without <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r. The fable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lame man who<br />

helped <strong>the</strong> blind in robbing an orchard<br />

is here given, and as it is shown that<br />

justice can be achieved only by punish-<br />

ing <strong>the</strong> lame and blind toge<strong>the</strong>r, ' so<br />

God brings <strong>the</strong> soul and puts it in <strong>the</strong><br />

body and punishes <strong>the</strong>m both toge<strong>the</strong>r '<br />

(oniN pi ^1^3 npiti notrj nud<br />

intoy In 91-104 <strong>the</strong> resurrection<br />

is that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit only. Sheol<br />

and hell (haguel = a-riikeia = in3X)<br />

are here used in <strong>the</strong>ir new sense <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Intermediate State. For some <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> chief changes in <strong>the</strong> meaning<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sheol see 631" note. Sheol and<br />

Abaddon are here apparently distin-<br />

guished. Is Sheol <strong>the</strong> intermediate<br />

place for <strong>the</strong> righteous and Abaddon<br />

for <strong>the</strong> wicked 1 Or is Sheol for <strong>the</strong><br />

righteous and <strong>the</strong> ordinary sinners,<br />

and Abaddon for only <strong>the</strong> apostates<br />

and <strong>the</strong> worst sinners ? Some such idea

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!