the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels
the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels
the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sect. II] Chapters L. S—LL 1 99<br />
And Sheol also shall give back that which it has received,<br />
Eetribution in O.T.,' Oct. 1890, 1-12<br />
Charles, Eschatology, Sebrew, Jewish,<br />
and Christian, 1899 (see Index). The<br />
various forms in which <strong>the</strong> Jewish<br />
doctrine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrection appeared<br />
are : (1) a resurrection <strong>of</strong> all Israelites.<br />
This doctrine is first taught in Dan. 12^;<br />
but, though so powerfully attested, it<br />
did not become <strong>the</strong> prevailing belief.<br />
It is <strong>the</strong> accepted faith in 1 En. 1-36<br />
(with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> one class <strong>of</strong><br />
sinners in 2213) 37.70 83-90 Ps. 65<br />
(title) in LXX 2 Mace. 7'. ". 2=. "s, so<br />
12", " compared with 6^8 2 Bar. 30<br />
50-51'. (2) A resurrection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
righteous Israelites. In post-Exilic Is.<br />
25' 2613 pgg. 1610, 11 1715 4915 7324-27<br />
(cf. Cheyne, Oyigin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Psalter,<br />
406-408) Job I4IS-I6 1926, 27 1 En. 91-<br />
104 Pss. Sol. 3" 133 14' 1515; Josephua,<br />
Ant. xviii. 1. 3 ; Bell. Jad. ii. 8. 14.<br />
That <strong>the</strong>. resurrection was <strong>the</strong> sole<br />
prerogative <strong>of</strong> righteous Israelites,<br />
became <strong>the</strong> accepted doctrine in Tal-<br />
mudio <strong>the</strong>ology : Weber, Jiid. Tlieol.<br />
390-391. Individual voices, how-<br />
ever, are not wanting, who asserted<br />
<strong>the</strong> resurrection <strong>of</strong> pious Gentiles,<br />
Eisenmenger, EntdecMes Jiidenthum,<br />
908, 909 :<br />
indeed, that <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> Gentiles,<br />
with some few exceptions, but only to<br />
die again, op. cit. 908-910; Weber, 391.<br />
Even imperfect Israelites could attain<br />
to this resurrection <strong>of</strong> life after purgation<br />
in Gehenna, Weber, 391. (3) A<br />
resurrection <strong>of</strong> all mankind, 4 Ezra<br />
752. " Test. XII Patriarch. Benj. 10«-8.<br />
Concurrently with <strong>the</strong> above forms <strong>of</strong><br />
doctrine, o<strong>the</strong>r Jews believed only in<br />
<strong>the</strong> immortality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> soul : Wisd. 31 ''i-<br />
47 516 §20 compared with 91s 15' Jub.<br />
23^". 1. The earth also ... received.<br />
So y save that for mahdanta<br />
(5, /3) = ' that which has been entrusted<br />
to it ' it substitutes a gloss = ' those<br />
who are treasured up in it ', t»<br />
are defective '<br />
; Sheol shall give back<br />
that which has been entrusted to it,<br />
;<br />
that which it has received." i8 has a<br />
conflate text based partly on <strong>the</strong> ori-<br />
ginal <strong>of</strong> g and ontu: ' <strong>the</strong> earth shall<br />
give back that which has been en-<br />
trusted to it, and Sheol shall give back<br />
that which has been entrusted to it,<br />
H 3<br />
that which it has received.' Cf.<br />
4 Ezra 7'^ 'Et terra reddet qui in ea<br />
dormiunt, et pulvis qui in eo silentio<br />
habitant, et prumptuaria reddent quae<br />
eis commendatae sunt animae' Our<br />
text is quoted in <strong>the</strong> Ps. Philo Liber<br />
bibl. Antiquifatum, an old Jewish work<br />
written originally in Hebrew soon after<br />
A.D. 70 but preserved only in Latin. It<br />
was printed thrice in <strong>the</strong> sixteenth centmy.<br />
See Snci/c. Brit.'^^ ii. 178. The<br />
earth gives up <strong>the</strong> body just as Sheol<br />
and Abaddon give up <strong>the</strong> soul. They<br />
are both reunited at <strong>the</strong> resurrection.<br />
The raising <strong>of</strong> both was subsequently<br />
justified in Sanh, 91* (Lev. E. iv)<br />
on <strong>the</strong> ground that <strong>the</strong> soul and body<br />
could respectively plead <strong>the</strong>ir inno-<br />
cence on <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> judgement in<br />
that nei<strong>the</strong>r had sinned without <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r. The fable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lame man who<br />
helped <strong>the</strong> blind in robbing an orchard<br />
is here given, and as it is shown that<br />
justice can be achieved only by punish-<br />
ing <strong>the</strong> lame and blind toge<strong>the</strong>r, ' so<br />
God brings <strong>the</strong> soul and puts it in <strong>the</strong><br />
body and punishes <strong>the</strong>m both toge<strong>the</strong>r '<br />
(oniN pi ^1^3 npiti notrj nud<br />
intoy In 91-104 <strong>the</strong> resurrection<br />
is that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit only. Sheol<br />
and hell (haguel = a-riikeia = in3X)<br />
are here used in <strong>the</strong>ir new sense <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Intermediate State. For some <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> chief changes in <strong>the</strong> meaning<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sheol see 631" note. Sheol and<br />
Abaddon are here apparently distin-<br />
guished. Is Sheol <strong>the</strong> intermediate<br />
place for <strong>the</strong> righteous and Abaddon<br />
for <strong>the</strong> wicked 1 Or is Sheol for <strong>the</strong><br />
righteous and <strong>the</strong> ordinary sinners,<br />
and Abaddon for only <strong>the</strong> apostates<br />
and <strong>the</strong> worst sinners ? Some such idea