02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction XXX Vll<br />

<strong>book</strong> in Enoch ; but concludes, against Hilgenfeld and Tide-<br />

man, that <strong>the</strong> Parables could not entirely be <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Christian; for if <strong>the</strong>y were such, <strong>the</strong>re would undoubtedly<br />

have been some reference to <strong>the</strong> crucified and risen Christ such<br />

as we find in Test. Levi ^^ *. The difficulties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case are<br />

met, he believes, by supposing that a Christian Apocalypse has<br />

been worked into <strong>the</strong> tissue <strong>of</strong> an earlier Jewish production, and<br />

that all <strong>the</strong> Messiah passages are due to <strong>the</strong> former. His chief<br />

arguments are : (i) <strong>the</strong> title ' son <strong>of</strong> a woman " could not have<br />

been applied by a pre-Christian Jew to a supernatural jNIessiah;<br />

(ii) a consistent text is possible by an omission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Messiah<br />

passages, a text also which answers to <strong>the</strong> title placed at <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> each Parable ;<br />

(iii) <strong>the</strong> closing chap. 71 confirms this<br />

view where in <strong>the</strong> description <strong>of</strong> a Theophany <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />

mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Messiah and <strong>the</strong> title 'Son <strong>of</strong> Man ' is applied<br />

to Enoch; (iv) <strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Jubilees, though using Enoch<br />

extensively, does not cite <strong>the</strong> Messiah passages.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong>se arguments <strong>the</strong> only one that can still be maintained<br />

with any show <strong>of</strong> reason is (ii), and this in itself will have no<br />

weight if we bear in mind <strong>the</strong> want <strong>of</strong> logical secLuence and <strong>the</strong><br />

frequent redundancy characteristic <strong>of</strong> Semitic writings generally<br />

and <strong>of</strong> Jewish apocalypses in particular. Moreover, in no in-<br />

stance that I am aware <strong>of</strong> does any superscription in Enoch give<br />

an exact account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chapters it introduces.<br />

Hauskath, ]\ eutestameuUiche Zeitgeschichie, Erster Theil,<br />

3rd ed., 1879, pp. 185-189, 191-193. The oldest <strong>book</strong>,<br />

1-36 72-105, is referred to <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> J. Hyrcanus. Tlie<br />

Parables, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Noachic interpolations,<br />

were probably composed in <strong>the</strong> reign <strong>of</strong> Herod <strong>the</strong> Great.<br />

Hausrath thinks that <strong>the</strong> Messiah-passages may have won<br />

somewhat <strong>of</strong> a Christian colouring in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> translation<br />

from Hebrew to G-reek and Greek to Ethiopic by Christian<br />

hands.<br />

LiPSius, art.<br />

' Enoch ' in Smith and Waee's Dictionary <strong>of</strong><br />

Christian Biography, vol. ii, 1880, pp. 124-128. (1) The oldest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!