02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ivtroduction xlv<br />

would be merely a useless repetition <strong>of</strong> 14— a description <strong>of</strong><br />

God^s habitation.<br />

(7) 72-82. Chapter 80 gives us <strong>the</strong> somewhat artificial con-<br />

nexion by which ' <strong>the</strong> writer ' has joined on this treatise on<br />

<strong>the</strong> stars to a <strong>book</strong> on <strong>the</strong> Messianic kingdom :<br />

<strong>the</strong> fair order<br />

described in 72-82 will change in <strong>the</strong> days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sinners. This<br />

Section has not come down to us in its original condition. 76-77<br />

deal with <strong>the</strong> winds, <strong>the</strong> points <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> compass, &c., though <strong>the</strong>se<br />

subjects have not been promised in 72*. Moreover, 79'"^ and<br />

82^"'' each form a conclusion : 82^"^" is incomplete, and ought<br />

to come before 79. Despite <strong>the</strong> partial resemblance in <strong>the</strong> sub-<br />

ject, especially in regard to <strong>the</strong> second source <strong>of</strong> 17-36 ( = 21-36),<br />

72—82 is not, at least in its original form, by <strong>the</strong> same author as<br />

21-36. For instance, <strong>the</strong> function <strong>of</strong> Uriel in 72^ agrees with<br />

that in 20^ 21« ; but Uriel writes for Enoch, 33^ while Enoch<br />

writes himself, 74^.<br />

(8)<br />

88-108. This part is quite in harmony with <strong>the</strong> subject<br />

proposed in 1^. Beer reckons in this Section six fragments more<br />

or less distinct: first, 83-84; second, 85-90; third, <strong>the</strong> Apo-<br />

calypse <strong>of</strong> Weeks, 92 93i-" gi^^-". fourth, <strong>the</strong> admonitions,<br />

911-11, 17, 18 94_i05 ; fifth, 106-107 ; sixth, 108. The Messiah<br />

occurs in 90"' ^^, but not at all in 1-36 or 72-82. This Messiah,<br />

sprung from Abraham, is .not <strong>the</strong> Messiah <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables, who<br />

is a heavenly, pre-existent being.<br />

Finally, Beer thus assigns <strong>the</strong> various passages to <strong>the</strong>ir different<br />

sources: A, from <strong>the</strong> Enoch cycle, (1) 1-5, (2) 12-16, (3) 17-19<br />

(4) 20-26, (5) 37-69, (6) 70-71, (7) 72-82, (8) 83-84, (9) 85-<br />

90, (10) 92 931-" 9112-"^ (11) 911-" 94-105, (12) 108. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se (5) and (7) may be subdivided, as above. B, from <strong>the</strong> Noah<br />

cycle, (13) 6-11, (14) 391- 2" 54^-55^ 60 65-69^5, (15) 106 107.<br />

Martin, Le Livre d'H<strong>enoch</strong> trachiit sur le texte etJiiopien,<br />

1906. This scholar (see pp. Ixxxviii-xcvii) designates <strong>the</strong> Book<br />

<strong>of</strong> Enoch as a mosaic composed <strong>of</strong> nine or ten distinct works or<br />

traditions emanating from <strong>the</strong> Enoch cycle. These are 1° 1-5 ;<br />

2° 6-16 20-36, before 166 b.c; 3" 17-19, before 166 B.C.;<br />

4° 37-69, 95-78 B.C.; 5° 70-71; 6° 72-82, before 135 e.g.;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!