02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 The Book <strong>of</strong> Enoch [Sect.lii<br />

Again, it is to be observed that tliis addition consists <strong>of</strong> tristichs,<br />

and is thus different in form from <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> 72-82. It can hardly<br />

be connected with any <strong>of</strong> tlie o<strong>the</strong>r writers <strong>of</strong> our <strong>book</strong>. The<br />

regularity <strong>of</strong> nature till <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new creation is an article<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir creed, though in later apocalypses this view is partially<br />

abandoned.<br />

Nor, again, can 81 belong to this <strong>book</strong>. Before entering on this<br />

question, however, let us consider 821"^, which forms, according to<br />

most critics, <strong>the</strong> close <strong>of</strong> this treatise, vv. 9-20 being regarded as<br />

a Noachic interpolation, but wrongly: see 82' (note). These verses,<br />

82i~8, manifestly do belong to 72-79. The same formula occurs in<br />

821, I my gQji Methuselah,' as in 76i* and in 79' (according to some<br />

MSS.). The wisdom dealt with in 82^"* is <strong>the</strong> same scientific lore<br />

as in 72-79. And <strong>the</strong> blessing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> 82 ^^^ is for <strong>the</strong> man<br />

who sins not in calculating <strong>the</strong> seasons, 82*.<br />

72-79 and 82 constitute <strong>the</strong> original Book <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Heavenly<br />

Luminaries. But, whereas <strong>the</strong> blessing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> 72-79, 82<br />

is for <strong>the</strong> man who knows <strong>the</strong> right reckoning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> years, <strong>the</strong><br />

blessing <strong>of</strong> 81* is for <strong>the</strong> man '<br />

who<br />

dies in righteousness . . . con-<br />

cerning whom <strong>the</strong>re is no <strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> unrighteousness written '. These<br />

two blessings, in fact, give <strong>the</strong> keynote <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respective contents<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Heavenly Luminaries and 81, and disclose <strong>the</strong><br />

motives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective authors. This chapter did not, any more<br />

than 80, belong to this treatise originally. In fact, we find on<br />

examination that it is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> a mosaic, and came probably<br />

from <strong>the</strong> editor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complete Enoch. The phrase ' those seven<br />

lioly ones', in 81^, j)oints to some previous statement apparently;<br />

but none such is to be found. The words may be drawn from<br />

9021, 22_ T]j3 heavenly tablets in Sl^. ^ may come from 93^ 103^.<br />

The expression 'Lord <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world', 811"^ may be suggested by<br />

82', ' Lord <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole creation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world,' &c.<br />

Again, we observe that 81*' " are written with reference to<br />

82i| ^ and 91^. This latter verse introduces <strong>the</strong> Section beginning<br />

in <strong>the</strong>. present form <strong>of</strong> Enoch with 91. We shall see later that 91<br />

does not really form <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last <strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> Enoch, but<br />

that it has been dislocated from its right position by <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> 81<br />

to serve his editorial purposes.<br />

Finally, with regard to 82, it is evident that it does not stand in<br />

its original position. The Book <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Heavenly Luminaries rightly<br />

concludes with 79, which closes thus: 'Such is tlae picture and<br />

sketch <strong>of</strong> every luminary, which Uriel <strong>the</strong> archangel, who is <strong>the</strong>ir

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!