02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hi The Book <strong>of</strong> Enoch<br />

lielaliou to 83-90. In 91-104 <strong>the</strong> Messianic kingdom is<br />

temporary in duration, but not so in 83-90 : in <strong>the</strong> former <strong>the</strong><br />

final judgement is consummated at <strong>the</strong> close <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kingdom, m<br />

<strong>the</strong> latter at its beginning. In 91-104 <strong>the</strong>re is a resurrection <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> righteous only ; in 83-90 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> righteous and <strong>the</strong> apostate<br />

Jews. The kingdom to which <strong>the</strong> righteous rise in 91-104 is not<br />

<strong>the</strong> temporary kingdom on <strong>the</strong> earth but <strong>the</strong> new heaven, but m<br />

83-90 it is <strong>the</strong> Messianic kingdom on <strong>the</strong> earth.<br />

105. This chapter appears to be an independent fragment.<br />

106-107. These chapters have already been dealt with as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Noah.<br />

108. This chapter forms an Appendix to <strong>the</strong> entire work,<br />

added not by <strong>the</strong> editor but by a subsequent writer to confirm<br />

<strong>the</strong> lighteous in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> repeated disappointment in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

expectations.<br />

§ 13, ChaI! ACTBRISTICS AND DaTES OF THE DIFFERENT<br />

Elements.<br />

I will here deal with <strong>the</strong>se elements in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir age.<br />

Book <strong>of</strong> Noa//. This <strong>book</strong> was, as we have seen already, laid<br />

under contribution by <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Jubilees and by<br />

<strong>the</strong> general editor <strong>of</strong> Enoch. Part <strong>of</strong> it is embodied in 6-36,<br />

and this part is presupposed as already existing by 83-90. Now,<br />

since 83-90 cannot be later than 161 B.C., it follows that we have<br />

here <strong>the</strong> leruiimts ad quew <strong>of</strong> this work.<br />

6-36. Since 6-16 23-36 were known to <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> tlie<br />

Book <strong>of</strong> Jubilees (see my edition, p. Ixix), this Section must have<br />

been written before <strong>the</strong> latter half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second century B.C.<br />

Since, fur<strong>the</strong>r, 83-90, written before 161 B.C., show a minute<br />

acquaintance with 10, <strong>the</strong> dale <strong>of</strong> 6-11 must be put back to <strong>the</strong><br />

first third <strong>of</strong> that century. Many o<strong>the</strong>r points in 83-90 (see<br />

p. 179) point to <strong>the</strong> acquaintance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> 83-90 with<br />

6-36. Again, since 6-36 makes no reference to <strong>the</strong> persecu-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> Antiochus, <strong>the</strong> terminus ad quern is thus fixed at 170 b. c.<br />

The fact that 6-36 was written in Aramaic is in favour <strong>of</strong> pre-<br />

jNIaccabean date; for when once a nation recovers, or is trying

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!