02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction xliii<br />

Charles. T/ie Book <strong>of</strong> Enoch, translated from Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Billmaniis Ethiopio Text, emended and revised in accordance with<br />

hi<strong>the</strong>rto uncollated Ethiopia MS8. and with <strong>the</strong> Gizeh and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Greek aid Latin Fragments, Oxford^ 1893.<br />

Clemen, Theologische Studien und Kritikeu, 1898, pp. 211-<br />

237, 'Die Zusammensetzung des Buches H<strong>enoch</strong>.' He<br />

emphasizes <strong>the</strong> varied traditions represented by <strong>the</strong> different<br />

portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>book</strong>. These twelve traditions <strong>the</strong> 'author <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>book</strong> ' ei<strong>the</strong>r found committed to writing or he collected <strong>the</strong>m<br />

from oral transmission. The earliest go back to 167 B.C., <strong>the</strong><br />

latest to 64 B.C. These traditions are (1) 1-5, (2) 6-11, (3) 12-<br />

16, (4) 17-19, (5) 20(?)-36, (6) 37-69, with some interpola-<br />

tions, (7) 70-71, (8) 721-9110.18 et s(iq.(?), (9) 92 93 911^-"<br />

94-105, (10) 106-107, (11) 108, (12) <strong>the</strong> Noachic fragments<br />

54''-55^ 60 651-69^^. The author found already existing in<br />

a written form (9) (11) (12), probably (3), and perhaps even (6).<br />

Clemen lays great stress on <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>of</strong> person as betraying<br />

<strong>the</strong> composite character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work.i<br />

Bebe, ' Das Buch H<strong>enoch</strong> ' {l)ie Apokryphen und Pseudepi-<br />

tjrapheii des A. T., Kautzsch, vol. ii, 1900, pp. 224-230). Beer<br />

thus divides <strong>the</strong> work :<br />

(1)<br />

1-5, a work complete in itself and yet forming an intro-<br />

duction in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> an apologia to <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>book</strong>.<br />

(2)<br />

6-11 comprise two different traditions interwoven. The<br />

burden <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former is <strong>the</strong> revelation <strong>of</strong> mysteries, and <strong>the</strong><br />

judgement by <strong>the</strong> Flood; that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter is <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> angels, <strong>the</strong>ir punishment, and <strong>the</strong> wickedness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> giants.<br />

The blending toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two traditions was made easier by<br />

<strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y both alike dealt with <strong>the</strong> leading astray <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> angels by <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> men. This fragment, thus<br />

surviving in two mutilated groups, has been drawn from a<br />

larger cycle <strong>of</strong> legends which grew up around <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Noah.<br />

&^~^ 7^"''<br />

The two groups might be distinguished as follows {a) :<br />

8* 91-5.9-11 10*-112 and {h)<br />

71'' 81-^ 9«-8 IQi-^.<br />

' The above details are due to Martin.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!