02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction xxxix<br />

i. The groundwork 1-36 72-105, before <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> Judas<br />

Maccabaeus.<br />

ii. The Parables 37-71, between 37-4 B.C.<br />

iii. Noachic interpolations S^'-SS^ 60 65-69^5 106-107.<br />

He thinks it probable that 20 70 75^ 828-2° 9311-u are also<br />

interpolations.<br />

WiESBLEE, 'Ueber die Form des jiidischen Jahres um die<br />

Zeit Jesu' {Beitrdge zur richtigen ffiirdigung der Evangelien,<br />

1869). We have here an interesting and valuable discussion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Calendar in Enoch.<br />

' Zur Abfassungszeit des Buchs H<strong>enoch</strong> ' {ZeitscJir. D. M, G.,<br />

1882, pp. 185-193). Wieseler assigns <strong>the</strong> Parables no less<br />

than <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>book</strong> to <strong>the</strong> reign <strong>of</strong> J. Hyrcanus.<br />

SoHUEERj A History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jewish People in <strong>the</strong> Time <strong>of</strong><br />

Jesus Christ (translated from <strong>the</strong> second and Revised Edition<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> German), vol. iii, div. ii, pp. 54-73, 1886. This is<br />

a most judicious statement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results already attained by<br />

criticism. Ili accordance with <strong>the</strong>se Sehiirer divides <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>book</strong> into three parts : (1) ' <strong>the</strong> original writing ' 1-36 72-105,<br />

written in <strong>the</strong> reign <strong>of</strong> J. Hyrcanus ; (2) <strong>the</strong> Parables, written<br />

in <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Herod <strong>the</strong> Great; (3) <strong>the</strong> Noachian Frag-<br />

ments, 54^-552 60 65-69^5, and probably 106-107. 108 is a later<br />

addition. He is careful, however, to remind us that <strong>the</strong><br />

' original writing is composed <strong>of</strong> very heterogeneous elements '.<br />

While he rightly dismisses as idle all attempts to introduce<br />

chronological exactness into <strong>the</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Seventy<br />

Shepherds, he thinks <strong>the</strong>re can be no doubt as to where <strong>the</strong><br />

different periods are intended to begin and end. It was Sehiirer<br />

who was <strong>the</strong> first to recognize <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> H<strong>of</strong>fmann's<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shepherds and to give it currency. This<br />

article concludes with a very full list <strong>of</strong> patristic passages re-<br />

ferring to Enoch and with an excellent bibliography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

literature. In his third edition, 1898, pp. 192-209, he maintains<br />

<strong>the</strong> same position.<br />

Stanton, The Jewish and <strong>the</strong> Christian Messiah, 1886, pp.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!