02.07.2013 Views

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

the-book-of-enoch-r-h-charles - Fallen Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction xlvii<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are from this source; also 106-107. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, 6-11 ^<br />

are derived from <strong>the</strong> same work. These latter chapters never<br />

refer to Enoch, but to Noah. Moreover, where <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong><br />

Jubilees in 720-25 describes <strong>the</strong> laws laid down by Noah for his<br />

children, and Noah's accounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evils that had brought <strong>the</strong><br />

Flood upon <strong>the</strong> earth, he borrows not only <strong>the</strong> ideas, but at<br />

times <strong>the</strong> very phraseology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se chapters. Finally, we may<br />

observe that chapters 88-891 presuppose a minute acquaintance<br />

with chapter 10. 54''-552 probably belong to <strong>the</strong> same source.<br />

The Noachic fragments ineservei in this <strong>book</strong> are thus : 6-11 54-55^<br />

60 65-6925 106-107.<br />

These facts throw some light on <strong>the</strong> strange vicissitudes to<br />

which even <strong>the</strong> traditional legends were subject. Thus it would<br />

appear that <strong>the</strong> Noah saga is older than <strong>the</strong> Enoch, and that<br />

<strong>the</strong> latter was built up on <strong>the</strong> debris <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former.<br />

Having now disposed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earlier materials utilized by <strong>the</strong><br />

writers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different Sections <strong>of</strong> Enoch, we shall now proceed<br />

to deal with <strong>the</strong> five Sections or Books in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

occurrence.<br />

Section I. 1-36. We have already seen that 6-11 belonged<br />

originally to <strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Noah; 12-16, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, are<br />

a vision or visions <strong>of</strong> Enoch in which he intercedes on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

Azazel and <strong>the</strong> Watchers. These visions are preserved in a<br />

fragmentary form, and not in <strong>the</strong>ir original order—a fact which<br />

is most probably due to <strong>the</strong> editor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole work, since <strong>the</strong><br />

same dislocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text recurs in 78-80 and 91-93. The<br />

original order <strong>of</strong> 12-16 was, so far as <strong>the</strong> present fragmentary<br />

text goes : 14^ . . . 131-2 133 133 134-10 i42_i62 ig^-s || IQ^-*.<br />

12i~2 is an editorial introduction.<br />

This portion <strong>of</strong> our text began obviously with <strong>the</strong> words ; I41<br />

' The <strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> righteousness, and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reprimand<br />

^ Even <strong>the</strong>se chapters are composite ; for <strong>the</strong>y are a conflation <strong>of</strong> two distinct<br />

cycles <strong>of</strong> myths relating respectively to Semjaza and Azazel (see later under<br />

<strong>the</strong> text, pp. 13-14 notes), and this conflation was anterior to <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

-Dream Visions, which presuppose <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se chapters in <strong>the</strong>ii' present<br />

form, or at all events <strong>of</strong> chapter 10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!