07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Title</strong>: Estimating the degree of neural activation in post-stroke muscles<br />

Authors: T. M. KESAR 1 , R. PERUMAL 2 , A. L. MEYERS 1 , *S. A. BINDER-MACLEOD 2 ;<br />

1 Interdisciplinary Program in Biomechanics and Movement Sci., 2 Dept Physical Therapy, Univ.<br />

Delaware, Newark, DE<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Muscle weakness is a common consequence of stroke. It is challenging, if not<br />

impossible, to parse the weakness in post-stroke muscles caused by atrophy versus deficits in<br />

neural activation of muscle. Also, because post-stroke individuals cannot fully activate their<br />

muscles, it is difficult to estimate the true <strong>for</strong>ce generating ability of post-stroke muscles.<br />

In this study, we compared two methods of estimating the maximum <strong>for</strong>ce generating ability and<br />

the degree of volitional activation of the paretic plantarflexor muscles in 9 post-stroke<br />

individuals. In the 1 st method (interpolated twitch technique (ITT)), the <strong>for</strong>ce response to a<br />

supramaximal electrical pulse was compared with the subject‟s muscle at rest and during a<br />

maximum volitional contraction (MVC) to asses the degree of volitional activation (VAITT). The<br />

VAITT and MVC values were then used to estimate the maximum <strong>for</strong>ce generating ability<br />

(MaxVA). In the 2 nd method, a sub-maximal twitch to tetanus ratio (TTR) and the maximum<br />

twitch <strong>for</strong>ce were used to estimate the maximum <strong>for</strong>ce generating ability (MaxTTR). Also, the<br />

ratio between the MVC and the MaxTTR provided a second measure of VATTR.<br />

Our results showed that the peak MVC <strong>for</strong>ces (102.1± 46.4 N) were markedly lower than the<br />

estimated maximum <strong>for</strong>ces (MaxVA=229.8±77.0 N and MaxTTR=272.1±107.1 N). There was no<br />

significant difference (p=0.35) between the MaxVA and the MaxTTR. The VAITT was 44.3±15.5%<br />

and the VATTR was 44.3±33%, implying marked impairments in neural activation post-stroke.<br />

Also, the VAITT and the VATTR were not significantly different (p=1). This study demonstrates<br />

the ferasibility of 2 methods (ITT and the TTR) <strong>for</strong> assessing post-stroke muscle weakness. Our<br />

results suggest that there were no differences in the estimated maximum <strong>for</strong>ce generating ability<br />

and the degree of volitional activation calculated using the 2 techniques. Future work is needed<br />

to compare the validity and reliability of these 2 techniques in post-stroke individuals.<br />

Disclosures: T.M. Kesar, None; S.A. Binder-Macleod , Principal investigator, B. Research<br />

Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants<br />

already received); R. Perumal, None; A.L. Meyers, None.<br />

Poster<br />

276. Voluntary Movement: Stroke, Damage, or Disease<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 276.5/KK15<br />

Topic: D.17.a. Kinematics and muscle activity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!