07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Support: NIH Grant EY11850<br />

HHMI<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Light stimuli alters the balance of two components of synaptic inhibition received by<br />

primate ON parasol ganglion cells<br />

Authors: J. P. CAFARO, *F. M. RIEKE;<br />

HHMI/Dept Physiol & Biophysics, Univ. Washington, Seattle, WA<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: The retina provides an excellent opportunity to examine the relationship between<br />

synaptic input and action potential generation because of the ability to record synaptic inputs<br />

elicited by physiological stimuli. We are exploring how excitatory and inhibitory synaptic input<br />

shape the spike output of primate ON parasol retinal ganglion cells. Consistent with work on<br />

other retinal ganglion cells, an increase in light intensity produced a rapid increase in excitatory<br />

synaptic input followed by a slower increase in inhibitory input. The timing of the inhibitory<br />

input was consistent with feed<strong>for</strong>ward inhibition. Surprisingly, a decrease in light intensity<br />

produced a slow decrease in excitatory input and a rapid increase in inhibitory input. Thus ON<br />

parasol cells apparently receive inhibitory input through both ON and OFF pathways. Consistent<br />

with this idea, application of the mGluR6 agonist, L-APB, abolished excitatory synaptic input<br />

but had a modest impact on the inhibitory synaptic input elicited by decreases in light intensity.<br />

The kinetics and timing of the ON and OFF inhibitory components suggest that synaptic<br />

inhibition may play two distinct roles in shaping spike output - i.e. the ON component of<br />

synaptic inhibition follows excitation closely and may thus abbreviate the duration of the<br />

resulting depolarization, while the OFF component operates in a push-pull fashion with<br />

excitation. The relative contribution of the ON and OFF components of synaptic inhibition were<br />

not fixed, but instead depended on both mean light level and contrast. The ON component of<br />

synaptic inhibition was relatively stronger at rod light levels than cone light levels. Similarly,<br />

increasing contrast at either rod or cone light levels caused a decrease in the contribution of the<br />

ON component of synaptic inhibition relative to the OFF component. We are currently<br />

investigating how this shift in the timing and kinetics of synaptic inhibition alters the cell‟s spike<br />

output.<br />

Disclosures: J.P. Cafaro, None; F.M. Rieke , None.<br />

Poster<br />

237. Synaptic Integration II<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 237.20/D45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!