07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Program#/Poster#: 296.2/TT8<br />

Topic: F.02.i. Learning and memory: Physiology and imaging<br />

Support: NIH Grant MH058847<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Neuronal activity encoding temporal-order memory of visual objects in the macaque<br />

entorhinal and perirhinal cortices<br />

Authors: *Y. NAYA, W. A. SUZUKI;<br />

Ctr. Neural Sci., New York Univ., New York, NY<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: The ability to recall specific temporal sequences of events in an episode is severely<br />

impaired in humans with memory impairment following medial temporal lobe damage. In the<br />

present study, we characterize neural activity in the macaque entorhinal and perirhinal (ER &<br />

PR) cortices as animals processed temporal order of items in memory. The task includes both an<br />

encoding and a retrieval phase. The encoding phase starts with the animal fixating a fixation<br />

point on a video monitor <strong>for</strong> 0.4 s. Then, a sequence of two cue stimuli (0.3 s <strong>for</strong> each) was<br />

presented with a blank delay interval (0.9 s) between them. Cue stimuli were pseudo-randomly<br />

chosen out of a pool of eight well-learned visual items. Following the second cue stimulus,<br />

another 0.5 s of fixation was required <strong>for</strong> the animal and a single drop of water was given as a<br />

reward. Then a blank inter-phase interval of 0.7-1.5 s was presented during which time no<br />

fixation was required. The retrieval phase started with the animal fixating a fixation <strong>for</strong> 1.0 s.<br />

Then, three choice stimuli were presented together; two of them were the items that had been<br />

presented as cue stimuli in the encoding phase, and another was chosen from the other six items.<br />

If the animal touched the two items in the same order as they were presented in the encoding<br />

phase, six drops of water was given as a reward. We recorded 125 neurons from the ER and PR<br />

cortices: 71 from Monkey G and 54 from Monkey B. Their responses during the cue periods<br />

were characterized at the single neuron level using a two-way ANOVA with temporal rank order<br />

and stimulus identity as main factors. We found 19.2 % (n = 24) of the recorded neurons showed<br />

temporal-order-selective responses (P < 0.05) and 36.8 % (n = 46) showed stimulus-selective<br />

responses (P < 0.05). Moreover, 19.6 % (n = 9) of stimulus-selective neurons showed significant<br />

interaction between temporal order and stimulus identity (P < 0.05). These results suggest that<br />

ER and PR neurons as a whole represent rank order in<strong>for</strong>mation as well as visual object<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation during the temporal order task and that some neurons can encode a particular<br />

temporal order of specific items at the single neuron level. This latter finding cannot be<br />

explained by a simple linear summation of temporal-order-selective responses and stimulusselective<br />

responses. Taken together, our present study suggests that ER and PR cortices<br />

participate in the encoding of stimulus-selective in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> a temporal order memory task.<br />

Disclosures: Y. Naya, None; W.A. Suzuki, None.<br />

Poster

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!