07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

incubation buffer (10 mM Na-Phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) and specific binding was assessed in<br />

mailers containing 20 pM 125 I-RTI-55 ([ 125 I]-(-)-2β-Carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)tropane]<br />

specific activity of 2200 Ci/mmol), and 200 nM GBR12935 (1-(2-Diphenylmethoxyethyl)-4-(3phenylpropyl)piperazine<br />

dihydrochloride) <strong>for</strong> 120 min. Non-specific binding was measured in<br />

the presence of 1 mM of paroxetine and 200 nM GBR12935. The brain slices were washed twice<br />

<strong>for</strong> 20 minutes in a cold buffer, and then quickly immersed in ice cold water, and left over night<br />

to air dry. The sections, along with I-125 standards, were exposed to the Fuji fluorescence plates<br />

<strong>for</strong> several hours and calibrated as nCi/mg-tissue. The plates were scanned and images were<br />

quantified by a calibration curve obtained from standards in a MCID imaging system. The<br />

binding was quantified in twenty five brain regions. Regional readings were trans<strong>for</strong>med to<br />

bindings (fmol/mg) to assess any possible influence of fluoxetine treatment on the SERT<br />

densities in the FSL and FRL groups.<br />

Four groups ANOVA showed highly significant brain region*group interaction; F(72,480)=12.5;<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!