07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Canadian Institute of Health Research<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: The effects of a graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP) in individuals<br />

with stroke: a multi-site randomized controlled trial<br />

Authors: *J. E. HARRIS 1 , J. J. ENG 2 , W. C. MILLER 3 , A. S. DAWSON 4 ;<br />

2 Physical Therapy, 3 Occup. Sci. and Occup. Therapy, 4 Med., 1 Univ. British Columbia,<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of a four week in-patient graded repetitive<br />

arm supplementary (GRASP) program on upper limb recovery in stroke.<br />

Methods: This was a multi-site single blind randomized controlled trial. All individuals who<br />

sustained a stroke and were admitted to one of 4 inpatient stroke rehabilitation sites were<br />

screened <strong>for</strong> study eligibility.<br />

Measures: Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (primary outcome), Action Research Arm<br />

Test, Motor Activity Log, Grip strength, SF-12 (secondary). Baseline measurements were taken<br />

within 72 hours of study admission, post intervention at the end of the 4 week intervention and<br />

retention at 3 months.<br />

Protocol: Participants were randomly assigned to either the control or experimental group. The<br />

experimental group received the GRASP protocol, a home-work based exercise program<br />

designed to improve paretic upper limb strength, active range of motion, and functional<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance. Three protocols (mild, moderate, and severe) were developed into exercise binders<br />

and kits. Participants were asked to complete the exercises 6 days per week, 60 minutes each day<br />

on their own or with family. The control group received an education binder with 4 modules (e.g.<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation on arm recovery, bone health). The study coordinator taught and monitored both<br />

protocols. All participants received usual care in addition to the study protocols.<br />

Statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat analyze was per<strong>for</strong>med. Group differences were tested<br />

using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). At each evaluation period the baseline score was used<br />

as the covariate.<br />

Results: Fifty four individuals were randomized to the GRASP protocol and fifty three to the<br />

control. At the end of the 4 week intervention, participants receiving the GRASP protocol<br />

showed greater improvement on the CAHAI compared to the control group (change score of<br />

14.1 versus 7.9, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!