07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

human object selective cortex, little is known about how multiple, simultaneous objects are<br />

encoded. Here we examined whether the neural representations of multiple simultaneouslyviewed<br />

objects reflect the patterns evoked by each component object, or whether they reflect<br />

entirely novel patterns of activity. We applied multivariate analyses to fMRI data collected while<br />

subjects viewed objects belonging to four categories (brushes, chairs, shoes, and cars), presented<br />

either singly or in pairs. Subjects per<strong>for</strong>med a one-back task that required them to attend to all<br />

items on the screen (i.e. either a single item, or both items in a pair.) We found that in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

about the identities of object pairs in activity patterns of the lateral occipital complex (LOC) was<br />

finely grained, permitting pattern classification techniques to reliably discriminate among all<br />

pairs. To understand the rules governing the representation of object pairs, we per<strong>for</strong>med a<br />

voxel-by-voxel analysis of the relationship between responses evoked by each pair and responses<br />

evoked by its component objects. Within individual voxels, variations in response strength across<br />

object pairs were well-predicted by the mean of responses to the corresponding component<br />

objects. We assessed the generality of this rule by measuring the ability of the classifier to<br />

identify object pairs after training with synthetic “pair” responses derived from the voxelwise<br />

means of the responses to component single items. Pair classification accuracy after training with<br />

synthetic pair input was comparable to accuracy after training with actual pair input. These<br />

results suggest that the representation of multiple objects in LOC is governed by response<br />

normalization mechanisms similar to those reported in single neuron studies of macaque<br />

extrastriate and inferotemporal cortices.<br />

Disclosures: S.P. MacEvoy, None; R.A. Epstein, None.<br />

Poster<br />

260. Objects and Faces in Humans II<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 260.17/BB29<br />

Topic: D.04.j. Processing of objects and faces<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: TMS evidence <strong>for</strong> category-selectivity in lateral occipital cortex: Triple dissociation<br />

between faces, objects, and bodies<br />

Authors: *D. J. PITCHER 1 , L. CHARLES 2 , J. DEVLIN 1 , V. WALSH 1 , B. DUCHAINE 1 ;<br />

1 Univ. Col. London, Instit of Cog Neurosciene, London, United Kingdom; 2 École Normale<br />

Supérieure, Paris, France<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Does object recognition depend on representations distributed across high-level visual<br />

cortex or on representations in specialized modules? Functional magnetic resonance imaging<br />

(fMRI) studies have identified category-selective areas, but these areas also carry in<strong>for</strong>mation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!