07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Title</strong>: Responses of T3 spinal neurons to cardiosomatic stimulation in proestrous female vs. male<br />

rats<br />

Authors: *J. M. LITTLE, J. P. FARBER, R. W. BLAIR, R. D. FOREMAN;<br />

Physiol., Univ. Oklahoma HSC, Oklahoma City, OK<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Gender differences in cardiac pain have been reported from clinical studies: compared<br />

to men, women experience chest pain from angina that is longer in duration, more severe, and<br />

more frequent. Referred pain areas associated with cardiac pathophysiology are also different,<br />

suggesting differences in processing of cardiosomatic input. The mechanisms underlying gender<br />

differences in cardiac pain are unknown. One possible mechanism <strong>for</strong> the observed differences<br />

could be related to the circulating levels of estradiol. The present study was done to test the<br />

hypothesis that there were gender differences related to estradiol levels in the responses of T3<br />

spinal neurons to cardiosomatic in<strong>for</strong>mation in an animal model that has been shown to exhibit<br />

cardiac pain. Estradiol levels peak between 50 and 150 pg/ml in female rats during proestrus. In<br />

male rats, estradiol levels range from 10 to 15 pg/ml. In this study, adult Sprague-Dawley male<br />

(n=10) and proestrous female rats (n=11) were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital and<br />

paralyzed. Extracellular potentials of T3 spinal neurons were recorded in response to mechanical<br />

somatic stimulation and chemical cardiac stimulation. A volume of 0.2 ml saline (control) was<br />

injected into the pericardial sac and removed after 60 seconds. This was followed by an injection<br />

of 0.2 ml algesic chemicals (noxious stimuli) into the pericardial sac. Somatic fields were located<br />

by applying brush, pressure, and pinch to the upper body. Sizes of the somatic fields were<br />

evaluated be<strong>for</strong>e and after intrapericardial injection of chemicals to determine if the chemicals<br />

sensitized the neurons. Thirty eight percent and 57% of neurons responded to noxious chemical<br />

cardiac stimuli in female and male rats, respectively. Of those neurons receiving input from the<br />

heart, 62% in female and 56% in male rats also received input from somatic structures. In female<br />

rats, 76% of neurons responding to somatic stimuli had somatic receptive fields located on the<br />

side of the upper body, while 24% of neurons had somatic fields located on the chest. Most of<br />

the somatic fields in male rats were also located on the side of the upper body (90%), with only a<br />

few located on the chest (10%). The size of the receptive fields between female and male rats<br />

was not significantly different. Somatic field sizes in 69% of neurons in females and 76% of<br />

neurons in males did not change after intrapericardial injection of noxious chemicals. These<br />

results indicate there are no significant differences (p>0.05) in the responses of T3 spinal<br />

neurons to mechanical somatic stimulation and noxious chemical cardiac stimulation between<br />

male and proestrous female rats, despite differences in estradiol levels.<br />

Disclosures: J.M. Little, None; J.P. Farber, None; R.W. Blair, None; R.D. Foreman, None.<br />

Poster<br />

269. Pain: Visceral Pain II<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!