07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Topic: F.01.f. Working memory<br />

Support: Alzheimers and Related Diseases Research Award Fund, Virginia Center on Aging<br />

NIH grants (AG 19653 and others)<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: The effect of COMT Val158Met on human working memory depends on age, task<br />

difficulty and memory load<br />

Authors: *M. LIN 1 , R. SUNDARARAJAN 2 , P. M. GREENWOOD 3 , R. PARASURAMAN 3 ,<br />

K. J. FRYXELL 2 ;<br />

1 Bioin<strong>for</strong>matics, 2 Mol. and Microbiol, George Mason Univ., Manassas, VA; 3 Psychology,<br />

George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: The age-related decline in working memory per<strong>for</strong>mance has been attributed to<br />

decline in dopaminergic functioning (Braver & Barch, 2002). Normal variation in genes<br />

controlling enzymes degrading dopamine in the synaptic cleft could affect enzyme efficiency,<br />

thereby exerting greater effects in the older brain. The COMT Val158Met polymorphism shown<br />

to influence rate of dopamine methylation in prefrontal cortex (Tunbridge et al., 2004) and has<br />

been found to affect working memory and executive per<strong>for</strong>mance (Weinberger, 2005). We asked<br />

whether normal aging would alter effects of the COMT SNP on spatial working memory<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance. The task required retention of up to 3 target dot locations <strong>for</strong> 3 sec. Memory was<br />

assessed in the accuracy of a same/different decision indicating whether the probe dot and the<br />

target dot were in the same location. There were 4 target-probe distances (differing in difficulty,<br />

one match, and 3 non-match based on different target-probe distance) and 3 levels of memory<br />

load (number of target locations). Factor analysis applied to working memory accuracy identified<br />

three latent factors correlated with different experimental conditions: (1) match trials; (2) nonmatch<br />

hard discrimination trials; (3) non-match easy discrimination trials. Mixed repeatedmeasures<br />

ANOVAs assessed the influence of target-probe distance and memory load on<br />

accuracy, as well as their interactions with COMT genotype and age. The influence of<br />

discrimination difficulty on accuracy varied with COMT genotype (p < 0.001) and age group (p<br />

< 0.001). The influence of memory load on accuracy varied with COMT genotype (p = 0.01) but<br />

not with age group (p = 0.22).<br />

Follow up mixed repeated-measures ANOVA on each factor assessed the influence of memory<br />

load, COMT genotype, and age on accuracy. On match trials, the trend of decreasing accuracy<br />

with increasing memory load was observed in young adults across COMT genotypes but not<br />

observed in older adults with COMT Val/Val and Met/Met genotypes. On non-match hard<br />

discrimination trials, COMT genotype and age did not change the effect of memory load on<br />

accuracy. On non-match easy discrimination trials, COMT Val/Val per<strong>for</strong>med better than the<br />

Val/Met and Met/Met in both young and older adults across three memory loads. These results<br />

confirm and extend our understanding of the role <strong>for</strong> genetic variation in dopamine availability<br />

on working memory per<strong>for</strong>mance in humans.<br />

References<br />

Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., 2002. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 809-817.<br />

Tunbridge, E.M. et al. 2004. J Neurosci. 24, 5331-5335.<br />

Weinberger, D.R. 2005. Clin Ther. 27 Suppl A, S8-S15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!