07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster<br />

288. Working Memory: Disorders, Genes and Connectivity<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 288.3/RR10<br />

Topic: F.01.f. Working memory<br />

Support: NIH T32 MH019879 (AK)<br />

NARSAD Young Investigator Award (JWB)<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: The influence of working memory on error-likelihood prediction in the anterior cingulate<br />

cortex and its disturbance in schizophrenia<br />

Authors: *A. KRAWITZ 1 , T. S. BRAVER 2 , D. M. BARCH 2 , J. W. BROWN 1 ;<br />

1 Psychological & Brain Sci., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN; 2 Psychology, Washington Univ.,<br />

St. Louis, MO<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Recent research has shown that anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) modulates the degree<br />

to which top-down cognitive control systems, including working memory (WM) in dorsolateral<br />

prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), are brought to bear in particular task contexts. Specifically,<br />

according to the error-likelihood model (Brown & Braver, 2005), the magnitude of ACC output<br />

in a given situation is proportional to the perceived probability of making an error. It has<br />

remained unknown whether ACC may use WM contents to guide error-likelihood prediction and<br />

thus complete a reciprocal loop between DLPFC and ACC, as predicted by recent work with the<br />

error-likelihood model. Furthermore, past studies suggest that the cognitive impairment found in<br />

schizophrenia involves WM-related deficits in DLPFC and per<strong>for</strong>mance monitoring deficits in<br />

ACC, but the impact of these deficits on the reciprocal interaction between the two areas remains<br />

unclear.<br />

We investigated whether in<strong>for</strong>mation in WM is used as context by ACC to in<strong>for</strong>m its evaluation<br />

of error likelihood in schizophrenia patients and in non-psychiatric controls. In a modified<br />

version of the change-signal task of Brown and Braver (2005), a cue predicting error likelihood<br />

was incidentally encoded into WM by participants in order to per<strong>for</strong>m a secondary delayed<br />

match-to-sample (DMTS) task. Following the cue, a blank-screen delay period occurred prior to<br />

the change-signal trial. Using a rapid event-related fMRI design with partial trial decomposition,<br />

we looked <strong>for</strong> error-likelihood related activity at the time of cue presentation and at the time of<br />

response to the change-signal target.<br />

In controls, we found an area of ACC whose activation at the response predicted error likelihood<br />

as indicated by the initial cue, even <strong>for</strong> trials without errors or response conflict. This area did<br />

not show error-likelihood related activity at the cue presentation. This illustrates that, in controls,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!