07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Abstract</strong>: In the influential Marr-Albus-Ito model, climbing fiber input from the inferior olive<br />

provides an error signal that shapes cerebellar processing to produce the correct output (see<br />

Albus 1971). This model has provided a mechanistic account of cerebellar function across a wide<br />

range of error-based learning tasks. A neurophysiological investigation of the inferior olive in<br />

cats, however, argues that olivary discharge is linked to unexpected somatosensory stimulation,<br />

independent of movement error (Horn et al. 2004).<br />

We suggest a third hypothesis, building on the premise that there may be two distinct types of<br />

on-line errors. Filled errors are directly conveyed by an unexpected sensory event; <strong>for</strong> example,<br />

stepping onto a sidewalk that is higher than expected may cause a person to trip on the curb. In<br />

contrast, empty errors occur when an expected sensory event is absent; when a boxer throws a<br />

punch, the lack of contact with his opponent indicates an error. We propose that the<br />

olivocerebellar system may be more sensitive to filled errors, perhaps because the time of the<br />

error is precisely defined.<br />

To test this prediction, human participants used an MR-compatible robotic manipulandum to<br />

move a cursor during an fMRI scanning session. In one condition, the goal was to pass through a<br />

virtual window. Contact with the surrounding walls was felt as a bump, a situation in which<br />

unexpected sensory in<strong>for</strong>mation conveys an error. In a second condition, the goal was to hit a<br />

bump the same size as the window. Errors <strong>for</strong> this condition would be indicated by the absence<br />

of an expected sensory signal. Both conditions required identical reaching movements <strong>for</strong> correct<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance. To ensure comparable error rates, we randomly rotated the cursor's trajectory.<br />

When participants made errors, activation was observed in the inferior olive, as well as motor<br />

regions of the cerebellum (ipsilateral lobule V and bilateral VIII). In a direct contrast of the two<br />

error types, filled errors were associated with greater activation in vermal lobule III and<br />

contralateral VIII, as well as the caudal aspect of the olive. Empty errors evoke activation in the<br />

rostral olive, as well as ipsilateral lobule V and bilateral Crus I. The olivocerebellar system, then,<br />

seems to react to both empty and filled errors, although with different subregions.<br />

Disclosures: J.E. Schlerf, None; J. Diedrichsen, None; R.B. Ivry, None.<br />

Poster<br />

262. Visually-Guided Reaching II<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 262.4/CC18<br />

Topic: D.05.d. Visually guided reaching<br />

Support: CIHR Grant 74634<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Oscillatory activity in different monkey premotor areas during a dissociated reaching task

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!