07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

about non-preferred objects. We tested the specificity of the occipital face area (OFA), the<br />

extrastriate body area (EBA), and lateral occipital area (LO) in the right hemisphere by<br />

delivering TMS during discrimination tasks involving faces, bodies, and novel objects. Target<br />

areas were individually localized using fMRI in fifteen subjects who were then tested in three<br />

separate TMS experiments. Each experiment compared per<strong>for</strong>mance on same-different matching<br />

tasks from two object classes while TMS was delivered over the cortical areas selective <strong>for</strong> those<br />

classes (e.g. face and object tasks with TMS over OFA and LO). Participants also per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

each task without TMS to act as a behavioral baseline. All three experiments showed a double<br />

dissociation with task per<strong>for</strong>mance impaired only on the site selective <strong>for</strong> that object class.<br />

Namely, TMS over OFA impaired discrimination of faces but not objects or bodies; TMS over<br />

LO impaired discrimination of objects but not faces or bodies; TMS over EBA impaired<br />

discrimination of bodies but not faces or objects. These results indicate that recognition of items<br />

from each category relies on representations in the respective category-selective areas and not on<br />

a more distributed representation.<br />

Disclosures: D.J. Pitcher , None; L. Charles, None; J. Devlin, None; V. Walsh, None; B.<br />

Duchaine, None.<br />

Poster<br />

260. Objects and Faces in Humans II<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 260.18/BB30<br />

Topic: D.04.j. Processing of objects and faces<br />

Support: CIHR<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Cue-integration and competition between shading and structure-from-motion<br />

Authors: *R. FARIVAR-MOHSENI, A. CHAUDHURI;<br />

Dept. of Psychology, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Natural vision requires integration of several co-localized depth cues, such as shading,<br />

stereopsis, and structure-from-motion. Typically, experiments investigating cue combinations<br />

have utilized an additive or subtractive approach, by adding or removing additional depth cues<br />

from the structure of an object. Here we investigated the possibility that different cues may<br />

integrate across space in order to drive a coherent percept. If cue-chimeria is resolved prior to<br />

processes of object recognition, then illusory effects seen in object recognition, such as the<br />

composite face effect, should be unaffected by cue-chimeric stimuli. If, on the other hand,<br />

different cues give rise to separate object descriptors, then the composite face effect should

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!