07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster<br />

277. Voluntary Movement: Cortical Planning and Execution II<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 277.26/LL18<br />

Topic: D.17.b. Cortical planning and execution<br />

Support: Department of Defense, Army Research Office, W911NF0510538<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Electrocortical dynamics during competitive psychomotor per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Authors: *J. C. RIETSCHEL 1 , M. E. COSTANZO 1 , R. N. GOODMAN 1 , A. J. HAUFLER 1 ,<br />

L.-C. LO 1 , C. G. MCDONALD 2 , M. SAFFER 1 , B. D. HATFIELD 1 ;<br />

1 Neurosci. and Cognitive Sci., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD; 2 Dept. of Psychology,<br />

George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Placing individuals in a competitive situation induces variability of their motor<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance; while some „rise to the occasion‟ others may respond by „choking.‟ Despite this<br />

robust behavioral phenomenon, the neurobiological changes that underlie this per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

variability are unclear. The psychomotor efficiency hypothesis posits that superior per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

occurs through a reduction of task-irrelevant cerebral cortical processing (Hatfield and Hillman,<br />

2001). Specifically, this reduction has been inferred through increases in alpha power which is<br />

thought to reflect cortical „idling‟ in areas not essential <strong>for</strong> task execution. However,<br />

investigation of this hypothesis has been limited to novice-expert contrasts and motor learning<br />

studies. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the changes in cerebral cortical dynamics<br />

and kinematics during competition in an ef<strong>for</strong>t to explain per<strong>for</strong>mance variability during a<br />

precision aiming task. Nineteen participants from the U. Maryland Reserve Officers' Training<br />

Corps (ROTC) program completed a pistol shooting task under both per<strong>for</strong>mance alone (PA) and<br />

competitive (C) conditions. EEG, autonomic measures and subjective self report were recorded<br />

from subjects while they completed the PA condition independently. These same measures were<br />

assessed during the C condition where the two participants were monitored simultaneously. The<br />

EEG montage consisted of 30 electrodes and was sampled at 1000Hz. Further, spectral averages<br />

in the alpha band (8-13Hz) were calculated <strong>for</strong> one-second bins in the 4 seconds preceding<br />

trigger pull. Alpha power was subjected to a 2 (Order) X 2 (Condition) X 2 (Hemisphere) X 5<br />

(Region) X 4 Second) ANOVA. Changes in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI), heart<br />

rate, cortisol and skin conductance provide evidence of a systematic difference in the<br />

psychological state between conditions, specifically, increased state anxiety during the C<br />

condition. Further, per<strong>for</strong>mance (i.e. aiming trajectories) was more variable during the<br />

competition along with a significant decrease in alpha power. These results provide support <strong>for</strong><br />

generalizing the psychomotor efficiency hypothesis to a competitive situation. Beyond the<br />

spectral assessment of EEG alpha power, an addition principal component analysis was<br />

employed to further elucidate the temporal dynamics and spatial specificity of the event-related<br />

alpha power.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!