07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Authors: *C. S. KONEN 1,2 , M. A. PINSK 1,2 , M. ARCARO 1,2 , X. LI 1,2 , S. J. INATI 3 , S.<br />

KASTNER 1,2,4 ;<br />

1 CSBMB, 2 Dept. Psychology, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ; 3 Ctr. <strong>for</strong> Brain Imaging, New<br />

York Univ., New York City, NY; 4 Princeton Neurosci. Inst., Princeton Uni., Princeton, NJ<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: The visual system is broadly divided into two separate pathways (Ungerleider &<br />

Mishkin 1982), a dorsal stream to posterior parietal cortex (PPC) that is associated with visuallyguided<br />

action, and a ventral stream to temporal cortex that is involved with object recognition.<br />

Despite this classical view, we have recently reported object-selectivity, and size and viewpoint<br />

invariance in areas along the dorsal pathway (Konen & Kastner 2008). Here, we investigated<br />

object-selective responses in monkey PPC using fMRI adaptation and compared them with those<br />

in human PPC.<br />

Two monkeys viewed geometric 2D-objects that alternated with scrambled pictures while<br />

maintaining fixation (Siemens Allegra 3T). In the adapted condition, one object was presented<br />

15 times. In the non-adapted condition, 15 different objects were presented once. In the sizeinvariance<br />

experiment, the adapted condition consisted of 15 presentations of one object in<br />

different sizes. Regions of interest were defined on the basis of anatomical locations (Saleem &<br />

Logothetis 2007).<br />

The comparison between adapted and non-adapted conditions revealed object-selective<br />

responses in monkey V4, TE, and TEO in the ventral pathway and LIP and VIP in the dorsal<br />

pathway. Similarly, ventral V4 and LOC as well as dorsal IPS1 and IPS2 in humans exhibited<br />

object-selectivity. In contrast to humans, intermediate areas of the dorsal pathway did not<br />

respond object-selective in monkeys. Further, invariant responses evoked by 2D-objects<br />

presented in different sizes were found in monkey LIP and VIP as well as in human IPS1 and<br />

IPS2 (in addition to ventral stream areas). Taken together, the organization of the ventral<br />

pathway in humans and non-human primates appears to be similar, while the organization of<br />

dorsal pathway may be fundamentally different in the two species.<br />

Disclosures: C.S. Konen, None; M.A. Pinsk, None; M. Arcaro, None; X. Li, None; S.J. Inati,<br />

None; S. Kastner, None.<br />

Poster<br />

261. Object and Faces: Neuronal Representation I<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 261.3/BB34<br />

Topic: D.04.j. Processing of objects and faces<br />

Support: NIH Grant EY011797

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!