07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

approximately 1.2 times higher than fat mass measurements using CCA, while QMR lean mass<br />

measurements are approximately 0.86 times those obtained using CCA. The consistent linear<br />

correlations between measurement methods indicate that studies using either method can be<br />

directly compared. This study also demonstrates that QMR measurements have higher precision<br />

<strong>for</strong> both fat and lean mass than measurements obtained using CCA. The coefficient of variation<br />

(CoV) from repeated measures was used to estimate precision of methods. In both fat and lean<br />

mass measurements, QMR showed significantly less variation between measurements than did<br />

CCA analysis (Fat mass: QMR Live = 0.942 ± 0.122; CCA = 5.286 ± 1.457; p = 0.0095; Lean<br />

mass: QMR Live = 0.225 ± 0.030; CCA = 0.975 ± 0.182; p = 0.0010). No significant differences<br />

in fat or lean mass CoV by strain were observed. We conclude that QMR offers a fast, nonterminal,<br />

and accurate method of body composition analysis, yielding measurements comparable<br />

to that obtained by CCA without the need <strong>for</strong> time-consuming chemical analyses of the latter<br />

method. This study and previous investigations using mice demonstrate that the EchoMRI QMR<br />

system is a valid method <strong>for</strong> body composition analysis in obesity research.<br />

Disclosures: J.P. Nixon, None; M. Zhang, None; C.M. Novak, None; J.A. Levine, None; C.<br />

Kotz, None.<br />

Poster<br />

284. Regulation of Food Intake and Body Weight: Integration of Peripheral Signals:<br />

Systems<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 284.10/QQ5<br />

Topic: E.07.b. Integration of peripheral signals: Systems<br />

Support: Unrestricted gift from Vivilac, Inc, Ashton, MD<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Growth and body composition of Charles River Sprague-Dawley rats<br />

Authors: J. LEGER 1 , *R. R. SAKAI 2 , T. CASTONGUAY 1 ;<br />

1 Nutr. and Food Sci., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD; 2 Dept Psych, North, Univ.<br />

Cincinnati GRI, Cincinnati, OH<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Laboratory rats have been used <strong>for</strong> studying the interaction between diet and body<br />

composition <strong>for</strong> more than 100 years. One of the assumptions that an experimenter makes in<br />

using rats is that if animals are fed the same diet and housed in the same environment that their<br />

growth and body composition will be the same. Differences in growth and body composition<br />

have been associated with strain, sex, cage size, activity level and a host of other environmental<br />

conditions (temperature, humidity, light cycle etc.). During the past year, we had the opportunity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!