07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 236.6/D6<br />

Topic: B.06.a. Docking and fusion<br />

Support: NIH Grant MH064070<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Relationship between vesicle pools, release probability, and the prevalence of rapid vesicle<br />

retrieval (kiss and run)<br />

Authors: Q. ZHANG, *R. W. TSIEN;<br />

Dept Molec & Cell Physiol, Stan<strong>for</strong>d Univ. Sch. Med., Stan<strong>for</strong>d, CA<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: There is growing evidence <strong>for</strong> the existence of non-classical fusion (modes generally<br />

termed “kiss-and-run”, K&R) in various secretory systems, but the cellular basis and biological<br />

impact of K&R are far from clear. We have developed a quantum dot (Qdot)-based approach to<br />

monitor the fate of individual synaptic vesicles as they undergo K&R or classical full collapse<br />

fusion (FCF). After loading a single vesicle with an indivisible probe, we could identify a<br />

vesicle‟s pool of origin with a hypertonic sucrose challenge, then track the fate of the once-used<br />

vesicle during subsequent electrical stimulation. This allowed us to clarify the basis of a<br />

progressive change in the prevalence of K&R during electrical stimulation, falling from 65% to<br />

5% at steady state. We prefaced the electrical stimulation with a hypertonic challenge to provoke<br />

a restricted turnover of the readily releasable pool (RRP). The hypertonic challenge produced a<br />

mixture of Qdot signals corresponding to K&R and FCF events that were similar in amplitude,<br />

time course and prevalence to those evoked at the start of electrical stimulation on its own. More<br />

than half of the hypertonicity-induced events were K&R. However, in the wake of the hypertonic<br />

challenge and RRP release, subsequent electrical stimulation evoked only a low, flat level of<br />

K&R usage (~5%). Thus, RRP vesicles show a much higher prevalence of K&R than reserve<br />

pool vesicles, and the gradual change in prevalence reflects usage of the RRP. Put differently,<br />

RRP residents acquired an enhanced propensity to undergo K&R, enabling their subsequent<br />

reuse. However, the readiness <strong>for</strong> K&R can be dissipated. Interestingly, we found that a loading<br />

procedure that targeted RRP vesicles led to preferential loading of vesicles releasable by<br />

subsequent hypertonic challenges, supporting the idea of a preferential recycling of RRP vesicles<br />

back to their pool of origin.<br />

Disclosures: Q. Zhang, None; R.W. Tsien , None.<br />

Poster<br />

236. Neurotransmitter Release: Docking and Fusion<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!