07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecognition might depend on representations that are tied to limited ranges of retinotopic<br />

positions. Thus, the same object presented in different positions might evoke only partially<br />

overlapping or even completely distinct representations, leading to distinct physiological<br />

responses in anterior object-selective cortex and limited behavioral position invariance. To test<br />

our behavioral hypothesis, participants were asked to indicate whether a briefly presented (66ms)<br />

stimulus was a whole or scrambled line drawing of an object. Many trials later (e.g. 256)<br />

participants saw the same stimulus again in either the same or a different position. The amount of<br />

priming <strong>for</strong> the repeated stimuli scaled with the distance between the initial and repeated<br />

positions. Priming was also qualitatively reduced when the positions were in different<br />

hemifields. To test our physiological hypothesis, we presented 24 of the objects used in our<br />

behavioral studies in each of the four quadrants (5° from fixation) in an event-related fMRI<br />

paradigm. The objects were divided evenly between six categories (faces, mammals, body parts,<br />

objects, tools, vehicles), allowing us to test <strong>for</strong> the relative effects of category and position<br />

changes. Participants per<strong>for</strong>med a color-matching task on the stimuli and fixation cross. In a set<br />

of independently defined ventral stream ROIs (LO, PFs, FFA), we then established the similarity<br />

of responses to the stimulus conditions using multivariate pattern analysis. We correlated the<br />

response pattern of each of the 96 stimulus conditions (24 objects * 4 quadrants) with every other<br />

condition within each ROI. We found a very clear effect of hemifield, with far lower correlations<br />

between presentations of objects occurring in different hemifields. Response patterns could also<br />

be grouped within a hemifield into the upper and lower quadrants. In many cases, the effect of<br />

position was stronger than that of category. The results indicate the presence of positiondependent<br />

object representations in anterior regions of the ventral stream, and establish that these<br />

representations have predictable behavioral consequences.<br />

Disclosures: D.J. Kravitz, None; N. Kriegeskorte, None; C.I. Baker, None.<br />

Poster<br />

260. Objects and Faces in Humans II<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 260.8/BB20<br />

Topic: D.04.j. Processing of objects and faces<br />

Support: NIH-NEI<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: A semantic encoding model that provides an unbiased description of object category<br />

selectivity in visual cortex<br />

Authors: *R. J. PRENGER 1 , T. NASELARIS 2 , K. KAY 3 , M. D. OLIVER 4 , A. T. VU 5 , J. L.<br />

GALLANT 2 ;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!