07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Program#/Poster#: 263.12/DD12<br />

Topic: D.06.c. Eye and head control<br />

Support: MRC<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Evidence <strong>for</strong> sampling and storage of visual motion in<strong>for</strong>mation in the predictive control<br />

of head and eye during head-free pursuit<br />

Authors: *R. ACKERLEY, S. COLLINS, G. R. BARNES;<br />

Fac. of Life Sci., Univ. of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: During head-free pursuit of a target, both the eyes and head move together using<br />

visual feedback and internal (extra-retinal) mechanisms. This necessitates that the vestibuloocular<br />

response is suppressed so that gaze (head + eye) and head move in the same direction. If a<br />

moving target is extinguished, the continuation of any movement must be controlled by internal<br />

mechanisms alone. Experiments were conducted to investigate the use of internal representations<br />

in reproducing target motion. After a period of fixation, the target moved with a randomized<br />

step-ramp horizontal motion (10-40 deg/sec, left or right) and subjects were instructed to follow<br />

the target with both eyes and head. In control trials the target was illuminated continuously. In a<br />

second set of trials (mid-ramp extinction), the target was visible in the first part of the ramp and<br />

then extinguished <strong>for</strong> 400-600ms be<strong>for</strong>e reappearing <strong>for</strong> the second part of the ramp. Some midramp<br />

extinction catch trials (10%) were embedded in the control trials. In a third set of trials<br />

step-ramp stimuli were presented in pairs of identical velocity. In the first of each pair (shortramp<br />

extinction), target motion was equivalent to the first part of the mid-ramp extinction but the<br />

second part (reappearance) was absent. Subjects tracked the target when visible and attempted to<br />

continue following it when extinguished, predicting its future trajectory. In the second of each<br />

pair (initial extinction), target motion was again equivalent to the mid-ramp extinction but the<br />

target was visible in the second part only. Subjects were encouraged to initiate eye and head<br />

movement so as to track the unseen target in anticipation of its appearance, using the extinction<br />

of fixation as a „go‟ cue. In all tasks, subjects were able to continue smooth eye and head<br />

movement even in the absence of visual input, a manifestation of the action of internal feedback.<br />

Moreover, they were able to grade their gaze and head velocity on the basis of expected target<br />

velocity. In both the mid-ramp extinction and catch trials, gaze and head velocity were sustained<br />

throughout target extinction. In these conditions motion in<strong>for</strong>mation was derived from the initial<br />

part of the same trial and depended on expectation of target reappearance. For the initial<br />

extinction, eye and head movements were initiated ~200ms after extinction of fixation and prior<br />

to target appearance. In this case, grading of gaze and head velocity must have been derived from<br />

the prior short-ramp. In both cases, results indicate that sampled velocity in<strong>for</strong>mation can be used<br />

to both generate and sustain eye and head responses when the target is not visible but when the<br />

future target trajectory can be predicted.<br />

Disclosures: R. Ackerley , None; S. Collins, None; G.R. Barnes, None.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!