07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

signal lags, then follows a shifted exponential, reaching asymptote <strong>for</strong> lags of about 1 second.<br />

The trajectory is consistent with the Leaky, Competing Accumulator Model of Usher and<br />

McClelland (2001). Under these conditions, the optimal policy is to choose the response<br />

associated with the larger reward 100% of the time at the earliest signal lags, where stimulus<br />

identification accuracy is at chance. As evidence accumulates, the reliance on reward relative to<br />

stimulus in<strong>for</strong>mation should gradually decrease, leveling off as accuracy approaches asymptote.<br />

We examine results from five participants. One showed no reward bias. For the others, the<br />

reward bias is very strong initially and then tapers off to a fixed level, in general agreement with<br />

the optimal policy. However, the initial bias is never as strong as would be optimal. The final<br />

bias is greater than optimal <strong>for</strong> some participants and less than optimal <strong>for</strong> others. Quantitative<br />

optimality analysis is carried out based on one dimensional stochastic accumulating models and<br />

signal detection theory. We also found that participants‟ fastest responses at each of the 10<br />

response lags tended to be more extreme than their slower responses (at short lags, faster<br />

responses were more biased toward the higher reward; at long lags, they were more accurate).<br />

We propose a model in which participants may maintain graded evidence and reward values until<br />

the arrival of the response signal, which then drives a race to threshold.<br />

Disclosures: J. Gao, None; R. Tortell, None; J.L. McClelland, None.<br />

Poster<br />

289. Human Decision Making<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 289.5/RR41<br />

Topic: F.01.g. Decision making and reasoning<br />

Support: EU IST 027198 "Decisions in Motion"<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Neural correlates of stimulus independent decisions in motion in depth<br />

Authors: *G. KOVÁCS 1,2 , C. CZIRÁKI 1,2 , M. W. GREENLEE 2 ;<br />

1 Dept Cognitive Sci., Tech. Univ. Budapest, Budapest, Hungary; 2 Inst. of Psychology, Univ. of<br />

Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Perceptual decision making is a complicated, multi-stage process. Currently human<br />

neuroimaging studies implicated a set of regions, extending from the medial frontal cortex to the<br />

inferior parietal lobule in various steps of perceptual judgments. However, relatively little is<br />

known about the dependence of perceptual decisions on the visual stimulus itself. In the current<br />

study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging during a demanding 3D heading<br />

estimation task. Subjects (n=13) were presented a constantly expanding optic-flow stimulus,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!