07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Support: NIH Grant R01-NS052509<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Effects of sensory manipulations on targeted arm movements after stroke<br />

Authors: *M. O. CONRAD, R. A. SCHEIDT, B. D. SCHMIT;<br />

Marquette Univ., Milwaukee, WI<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Stroke survivors commonly experience hemiparesis of the arm, resulting in decreased<br />

strength and sensation in the limb as well as increased spasticity, discoordination, reduced range<br />

of motion and instability of endpoint control. Because prior research suggests that sensory<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation from hand and wrist musculature influences control of proximal joints, we<br />

hypothesized that control of proximal musculature could be improved post-stroke by providing<br />

augmented feedback from distal sensory systems. Here we study the influence of enhanced Ia<br />

afferent input from distal <strong>for</strong>earm muscles on the kinematics of point-to-point reaching<br />

movements (eg. endpoint stability and range of motion at the shoulder and elbow). Ten<br />

hemiparetic, chronic stroke survivors were seated com<strong>for</strong>tably as they grasped the handle of a<br />

horizontal planar two joint robot with their impaired hand. Participants made center-out reaching<br />

movements in 8 directions in the horizontal plane. Movements were cued by the appearance of<br />

targets on a screen that obstructed the view of the participant‟s arm. Visual feedback of hand<br />

position was also projected as a cursor on the screen. After 80 baseline trials, custom designed<br />

tendon vibrators (Faulhaber Group, Clearwater, FL) applied 70Hz vibration to the <strong>for</strong>earm flexor<br />

tendons <strong>for</strong> 40 trials. Hand position, velocity and grip <strong>for</strong>ce data were compared prior to, during<br />

and post tendon vibration. At baseline, stroke survivors generally experienced more success at<br />

medial and lateral mobility than <strong>for</strong>ward and backward movement, and often demonstrated<br />

instability of the endpoint position about the target. Vibratory stimulation of the <strong>for</strong>earm altered<br />

control of planar arm movements in stroke subjects. Endpoint stabilization was measured as the<br />

variance in the tangential velocity after the primary reach towards a target was complete.<br />

Vibratory stimulation enhanced stabilization in the upper arm as evidenced by a general decrease<br />

in variance in tangential velocity at the end of the reaching movements. Removal of the stimulus<br />

resulted in even greater increases in endpoint stabilization <strong>for</strong> those movements requiring<br />

shoulder flexion and extension. Additionally, the presence of a vibratory stimulus tended to<br />

decrease movement extent. Taken together, these results suggest that sensory stimulation of the<br />

wrist and finger musculature alters motor control of the upper arm, particularly enhancing a<br />

flexor response in the upper arm during planar reaches. After the removal of a vibratory<br />

stimulus, additional improvements in endpoint stability suggest that neural plasticity may be<br />

manipulated to promote improvements in movement kinematics post-stroke.<br />

Disclosures: M.O. Conrad, None; R.A. Scheidt, None; B.D. Schmit, None.<br />

Poster<br />

276. Voluntary Movement: Stroke, Damage, or Disease

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!