07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

difference exists in the eye-in-head component, is it related to the head velocity produced in HU<br />

trials? Also can this difference be explained by the firing rate of VN neurons (positionvestibular-pause<br />

and eye-head cells) known to project to the ABD? To answer these questions,<br />

the activities of excitatory burst neurons and their inhibitory counterpart, collectively referred to<br />

as burst neurons (BNs), were recorded during HR and HU gaze shifts per<strong>for</strong>med by non human<br />

primates. The burst profile recorded on each HU trial was matched, in a root-mean-squared-error<br />

sense, with a burst measured during HR trials, thus satisfying the assumption that the oculomotor<br />

input to the ABD was the same. Matched trials were found to have similar gaze amplitudes, but<br />

the amplitude and peak velocity of the saccadic eye component was lower <strong>for</strong> HU movements.<br />

Thus, the difference in the eye velocity wave<strong>for</strong>ms of HR and HU trials reflects the ocular<br />

counter-rotation induced by the head movement. The counter-rotation gain, defined as the ratio<br />

of the difference in the eye velocities and the head velocity, was high (>10) and variable at the<br />

onset of the movement, decreased smoothly during the gaze shift and stabilized at one after gaze<br />

shift offset. Finally a computer simulation was used to check if the difference in the eye<br />

velocities could be explained by VN inputs. The simulation modeled the difference in ABD<br />

firing rate (ΓABD) between HR and HU matched trials as the weighted sum of the difference in<br />

the firing rate of VN (ΓPVPc, ΓPVPi and ΓEHc) input. The oculomotor input was not used in<br />

this model because <strong>for</strong> matched trials the difference equals zero. Linear regression algorithm was<br />

used to find the optimal set of weights to fit this difference model. The result of this simulation<br />

showed that the weight of EHc cells input was the highest and accounted <strong>for</strong> most of the<br />

difference in the ABD and consequently the difference in the eye velocities. This leads to the<br />

implication that EHc cells play a major role in reducing the eye velocity during head<br />

unrestrained gaze shifts.<br />

Disclosures: B.P. Bechara, None; N.J. Gandhi, None.<br />

Poster<br />

263. Eye Movements: Eye and Head Control<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 263.11/DD11<br />

Topic: D.06.c. Eye and head control<br />

Support: NSERC (Canada)<br />

Botterell Fund (Queen‟s University, Canada)<br />

Marie Curie (EU)<br />

IAP (Belgium), ARC (UCLouvain, Belgium)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!