07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster<br />

295. Memory Consolidation, Reconsolidation, Anatomy, and Mechanisms<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 295.5/SS55<br />

Topic: F.02.h. Memory modulation, consolidation, and reconsolidation<br />

Support: NIMH Grant R01 MH074736<br />

NIMH Grant R01 MH65635<br />

NARSAD Independent Investigator Award<br />

<strong>Title</strong>: Memory reactivations strengthen memory retention and persistence<br />

Authors: *J. S. RICEBERG, D. Y. CHEN, S. M. TAUBENFELD, C. M. ALBERINI;<br />

Neurosci., Mount Sinai Sch. of Med., New York, NY<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong>: Newly learned in<strong>for</strong>mation is initially in a labile state and over time stabilizes into<br />

long-term memory by a consolidation process requiring RNA and protein synthesis. Previously<br />

established memories can also become transiently labile if reactivated, <strong>for</strong> example, by retrieval.<br />

This post-reactivation phase again depends on new protein synthesis and is known as<br />

reconsolidation. Why should a stabilized memory return to this vulnerable state? One hypothesis<br />

proposes that the labile phase of reconsolidation mediates memory strengthening. Using a singletrial<br />

inhibitory avoidance (IA) paradigm in rat, we tested whether reactivation exposures affect<br />

memory strength. During IA, animals <strong>for</strong>m an association between a CS (context) and a US<br />

(foot-shock): reactivation of this memory typically consists of an exposure to the CS alone.<br />

However, exposure to a non-rein<strong>for</strong>ced CS can also elicit extinction learning, which results in a<br />

decrease of the conditioned response. We used protocols that do not induce behavioral extinction<br />

to test whether the strength and/or persistence of IA memory is affected by reactivation<br />

exposures and whether these potential changes critically involve the labile phase of<br />

reconsolidation. We found that the retention of IA memory is a graded function of the number of<br />

reactivations. Results from experiments using both short (2-day) and long (7-day) interreactivation<br />

intervals indicate that the incremental changes in memory retention contribute to<br />

both strengthening and preventing the decay of memory. These findings support the hypothesis<br />

that single-trial fear memories are strengthened and maintained through reactivation/s of the<br />

original experience.<br />

Disclosures: J.S. Riceberg , None; D.Y. Chen, None; S.M. Taubenfeld, None; C.M. Alberini,<br />

None.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!