07.01.2013 Views

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

[Abstract Title]. - Society for Neuroscience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

was that eye position would dominate the response via the gain field.<br />

Neural activity was recorded in areas 7a and DP contralateral to the reaching arm. The monkey<br />

was required to fixate one of 9 positions on a touch screen while a visual stimulus (expansion<br />

optic flow, radius 6º) appeared behind the fixation point. The change from structured to<br />

unstructured motion cued the monkey to make a ballistic hand movement towards the target and<br />

hold his hand in place. A binocular Fresnel prism introduced a 10º shift in the same direction or<br />

the opposite direction as the spatial gain field of the unit; the monkey had to reach to the physical<br />

location of the target which did not match the perceived location. The trained monkey correctly<br />

reached to the target within a few trials demonstrating swift adaptation to the distortion. Changes<br />

in firing rate were assessed across 3 events of the task: (1) fixation onset, (2) visual stimulus<br />

onset (“visual signal”), and (3) lifting of hand from rest (“reach signal”). Linear regressions with<br />

categorical variables denoting the presence or absence of the prism distortion quantified changes<br />

in spatial tuning.<br />

Spatial tuning of single unit activity was compared during the “pre-prism” block, the “prism”<br />

block, and the “post-prism” block (33/60); the remainder were not tested “post prism”. The<br />

spatial tuning typically returned to pre-prism levels once the prism was removed. Alteration of<br />

the spatial tuning with insertion of the prisms to at least one event was found in 26/33 units. If<br />

the cells merely responded to the shift in eye position in the prism block, the firing rate would be<br />

expected to vary in proportion to the slope of the gain field. This did not occur indicating more<br />

complex interactions between the prism and neuronal activity.<br />

In many cases, the prism distortion altered the slope of the reach field. For some cells, the change<br />

in the shape of the reach field acted in a manner to correct <strong>for</strong> the prisms (10/24). In others, there<br />

was no clear relation between the prism and the change in the reach field.<br />

Similar variations in spatial tuning were observed <strong>for</strong> the fixation onset and the visual signal.<br />

These dramatic changes in spatial tuning across all measured neural events suggest that there is a<br />

range of remapping of the sensorimotor trans<strong>for</strong>mations that guide reaching.<br />

Disclosures: A. Karnik, None; B. Heider, None; R.M. Siegel, None.<br />

Poster<br />

262. Visually-Guided Reaching II<br />

Time: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm<br />

Program#/Poster#: 262.11/CC25<br />

Topic: D.05.d. Visually guided reaching<br />

Support: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada<br />

National Institutes of Health

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!