The 'New Berlin' base: Nazis in the Antarctic - Project Camelot
The 'New Berlin' base: Nazis in the Antarctic - Project Camelot
The 'New Berlin' base: Nazis in the Antarctic - Project Camelot
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
As you will see on <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g pages it really makes sense to say that light only can move through a surround<strong>in</strong>g e<strong>the</strong>r with<br />
a constant velocity C or K like Konrad Lorentz has done it. Cause out of a assumption like this one you as well can derive <strong>the</strong><br />
well-known Room-mechanics-effects (Compare next pages) as well as <strong>the</strong> typical Room-time diagramms with 3 roomdirections<br />
and one 4.th room-direction for <strong>the</strong> time (<strong>in</strong> detail <strong>the</strong> very <strong>in</strong>dividual object-time of one particle).<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>r Conclusions out of this e<strong>the</strong>r-model are: Time can’t past backwards. Cause it doesn’t matter if a electron rolls along<br />
its 4-thread “upstairs (time goes foreward?)” or “downstairs”(time goes backward?). Cause it as well should be able to emit /<br />
absorb photons <strong>in</strong> both directions (Compare <strong>the</strong>ir electric <strong>in</strong>teraction model). So time only can past a bit slower or faster but<br />
time can’t past backwards. Moreover one can expect (when all that was correct what one has told me <strong>in</strong> our <strong>base</strong> about <strong>the</strong><br />
electric <strong>in</strong>teraction) that <strong>in</strong> normal materia <strong>the</strong> 4-threads roll “foreward” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 4.th room-direction cause time should past<br />
here forewards and <strong>in</strong> Anti-materia <strong>the</strong> 4-threads roll “backwards” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 4.th room-direction. So <strong>in</strong> normal materia you<br />
maybe have to pa<strong>in</strong>t <strong>the</strong> 4-threads “above” <strong>the</strong> room of <strong>in</strong>teractions while you have to pa<strong>in</strong>t <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> Anti-materia “below” <strong>the</strong><br />
room of <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />
In contrast to all that to have a positive or negative charge has maybe someth<strong>in</strong>g to do with be<strong>in</strong>g below or above <strong>the</strong> flat l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
of <strong>the</strong> room of <strong>in</strong>teractions (compare <strong>the</strong>ir pictures to <strong>the</strong> electric <strong>in</strong>teraction).<br />
<strong>The</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r: About all that one has told me <strong>in</strong> our <strong>base</strong> that it would have 5 dimensions, is made out of electrons, positrons and<br />
waves (=Photons?), that its green 4.th field-component and also its 5.th field-component? would “rema<strong>in</strong>?” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> room. So<br />
one maybe has to pa<strong>in</strong>t two green l<strong>in</strong>es with <strong>the</strong> same length at one electron <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> room and not one like on <strong>the</strong> picture<br />
upstairs?! Of course this two green l<strong>in</strong>es at one particle should stand up <strong>the</strong>n vertically on each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
Moreover one has told me <strong>in</strong> our <strong>base</strong> that <strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r would have a few very exotic abilities like for example that its 4-phase<br />
can tell us someth<strong>in</strong>g about possible developments <strong>in</strong> future <strong>in</strong>clusive human decisions or that one can do “Soul-travell<strong>in</strong>g”<br />
with <strong>the</strong> help of it.<br />
I claim now, that <strong>in</strong> all 5 room-directions of <strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r (= your physics fields) photons only can move with <strong>the</strong> constant<br />
velocity K. As you will see later this velocity K will be <strong>the</strong> well-known velocity C of <strong>the</strong> light <strong>in</strong> your own object-time. That<br />
makes <strong>the</strong> time-delay, <strong>the</strong> room-contraction, <strong>the</strong> constant speed of light C between two mirrors … and so on and not<br />
E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>s Special <strong>The</strong>ory of Relativity. One can’t measure distance <strong>in</strong> a 4-dim room as ict negative and as well positive when<br />
it is necessary. Moreover <strong>the</strong>re is no reason for claim<strong>in</strong>g a e<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ART but to say <strong>the</strong>n that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SRT this e<strong>the</strong>r<br />
wouldn’t exist any more. To assume that <strong>the</strong> velocity of light <strong>in</strong> a 3-dim room always must be constant is certa<strong>in</strong>ly O.K. <strong>in</strong> a<br />
e<strong>the</strong>r-<strong>the</strong>ory but when you say that <strong>the</strong>re exists no e<strong>the</strong>r it does not make much sense.<br />
K<br />
V4, r. t. 2 + V5 2 = K 2<br />
K<br />
K v4, r.t. K<br />
v5 ≠ time<br />
349<br />
<strong>The</strong> 5-dimensional e<strong>the</strong>r<br />
That now this e<strong>the</strong>r-<strong>the</strong>ory makes <strong>the</strong> room-contraction and <strong>the</strong> time-delay, you can understand, when you watch E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>-<br />
Cruises of mov<strong>in</strong>g objects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 5-dimensional surround<strong>in</strong>g e<strong>the</strong>r. Because <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>-Cruises you can see <strong>the</strong> roomcontraction<br />
and <strong>the</strong> time-delay most best. That way one also has expla<strong>in</strong>ed me this <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>in</strong> our <strong>base</strong>. <strong>The</strong>se E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>-Cruises<br />
can be pa<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> a two-leveled picture of <strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r. Because when <strong>the</strong> second green field-thread <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 5.th room-direction is<br />
as long as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 4.th room-direction it doesn’t matter if you watch a particle with one green thread <strong>in</strong> a 4-dim room or with<br />
two green threads <strong>in</strong> a 5-dim room. That is why I will watch on <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g sides only 4-dim views of one particle <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
surround<strong>in</strong>g e<strong>the</strong>r. Both E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>-Cruises which I want to watch <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r look somehow like that:<br />
Two E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> Cruises<br />
v4, r.t. <strong>The</strong> whole field of <strong>the</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g object.<br />
<strong>The</strong> velocity of <strong>the</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g object is v 3.<br />
v4, r.t.<br />
v4, object-time<br />
v3<br />
v4, r.t. v4, r.t.<br />
v4, r.t. <strong>The</strong> room of <strong>in</strong>ter-<br />
actions ( 3 dimensions).