06.10.2013 Aufrufe

The 'New Berlin' base: Nazis in the Antarctic - Project Camelot

The 'New Berlin' base: Nazis in the Antarctic - Project Camelot

The 'New Berlin' base: Nazis in the Antarctic - Project Camelot

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

And can one also derive <strong>the</strong> Photon-Rotation Energy ħ = h • 1 /2π (Ergänzung von mir):<br />

In order to derive <strong>the</strong> Rotation Energy ħ = h • 1 /2π watch at first this picture:<br />

<strong>the</strong> field of <strong>the</strong> photon <strong>The</strong> 3-dim room <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> photon<br />

K or C<br />

V*<br />

355<br />

Mov<strong>in</strong>g around and around also with<br />

<strong>the</strong> velocity C or K.<br />

<strong>the</strong> e<strong>the</strong>r of an o<strong>the</strong>r bigger photon?<br />

So as you see <strong>the</strong> 3-dim room <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Photon also all <strong>the</strong> time moves around and around. One part ( 1 / 2M) moves around and<br />

around with <strong>the</strong> velocity V 1 = 2C, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r part ( 1 / 2M) with <strong>the</strong> velocity V 2 = 0 (Rema<strong>in</strong>s on <strong>the</strong> orange l<strong>in</strong>e). All this you<br />

also can see at this picture:<br />

With: PRot = 2 • C • 1 /2M = MC = P<br />

and: P0 = 0 • 1 /2M = 0 C or K<br />

V*<br />

R<br />

PRot • m<br />

1 /2M<br />

P0 = 0<br />

?<br />

1 /2M<br />

λ = 2 π R (with R <strong>the</strong> maxime radius of <strong>the</strong> Photon/Universe)<br />

Or as well one maybe also can say that <strong>the</strong> field of <strong>the</strong> mass M (grey plane) and <strong>the</strong>refore also <strong>the</strong> mass M turns around and<br />

around with <strong>the</strong> velocity C <strong>in</strong> a circle with <strong>the</strong> radius R. <strong>The</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> mass M should have <strong>the</strong> rotat<strong>in</strong>g-impulse PRot = MC<br />

when it comes <strong>in</strong> a not rotat<strong>in</strong>g field.<br />

We know now that also <strong>the</strong> room <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Photon has an impulse P because of its movement through <strong>the</strong> room with <strong>the</strong> velocity<br />

C. I assume now that this impulse P = PRot <strong>the</strong> impulse with which <strong>the</strong> same “<strong>in</strong>ternal” mass M <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Photon goes around<br />

and around <strong>in</strong> a circle! Because both have <strong>the</strong> same mass M and <strong>the</strong> same velocity C!<br />

Moreover I want to say: Over <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> impulse PRot also should not produce an result<strong>in</strong>g impulse P’ <strong>in</strong> one direction. I<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k, <strong>the</strong> reason for that is that he all <strong>the</strong> time moves around and around <strong>in</strong> a circle.<br />

Moreover I want to say: We have not considered that <strong>the</strong> 3-dim field <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> room has an different thickness <strong>in</strong> each moment.<br />

But that doesn’t matter. Because we also can use an middle-worth for <strong>the</strong> impulse PRot or P over <strong>the</strong> time. Our results will be<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> same like without middle-worth.<br />

Next I want to calculate <strong>the</strong> Rotation-impulse L = PRot • R of our Photon. We already know that PRot = P = h /λ .<br />

Moreover we know that λ = 2 π R (compare upstairs). <strong>The</strong>se two equations we use now to calculate L:<br />

L = PRot • R<br />

L = P • R (P = PRot)<br />

L = h /λ • R (first equation)<br />

L = h /2 π R • R (second equation)<br />

L = h /2 π<br />

So as you see each Photon-Quant should not only have an constant Energy h but also an constant Rotat<strong>in</strong>g-impulse L = ħ =<br />

h • 1 /2π . Maybe all this also can expla<strong>in</strong> why <strong>the</strong>re also exist Rotation-impulses L = h • 1 /4π (for example <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> electron).<br />

This one can expla<strong>in</strong> for example when <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> Rotation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Photon changes after <strong>the</strong> time-period λ /2 (First

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!