22.12.2012 Views

Dimensiuni ale limbajului n context carceral

Dimensiuni ale limbajului n context carceral

Dimensiuni ale limbajului n context carceral

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

adjective. This becomes relevant and obvious mostly in the case of adjectives which are feminine. In order for<br />

the gender morpheme to be attached to an adjective, an agreement relation needs to be visible.<br />

We choose interpretation b2, because we believe it explains the phenomenon better. As a conclusion, in this<br />

case we deal with a syntactic function in adverbial construction of exception.<br />

2.2. PP = P + ADVP<br />

This case is similar to the one above in that the preposition cannot discharge Case onto an adverb, because the<br />

adverb is never marked for case, as it is invariable. But this case is different from 2.1 because P + ADVP is a<br />

valid constituent (e.g. from above, under here, over there). But, despite this, we cannot treat in a unitary<br />

fashion except (for) here and under here. The here in except (for) here depends on/ is governed by the<br />

predicate, whereas the here in under here is governed by under.<br />

As a conclusion, in this case we deal with a syntactic function in adverbial construction of exception.<br />

For exception adverbials:<br />

(5) place adverbial: Am umblat peste tot, în afară de acolo./We strolled everywhere, except (for) there.<br />

(6) time adverbial: Ne-am întâlnit în fiecare zi, afară de ieri./ We met everyday, except (for) yesterday.<br />

(7) manner adverbial: În afară de foarte prost, altcumva nu ştie să lucreze./He cannot work other than really bad.<br />

2.3. Complememtizer Phrases<br />

When the original syntactic functions inserted in the specialized functional frame have any value, except for<br />

that of predicate, we speak of adverbial constructions. We consider this to be so because the initial sub-clauses<br />

maintain their initial complementizer (whether it is a conjunction or a relative adverb).<br />

2.3.1. Therefore, if the initial sub-clause is intoduced by că/să/that, the sub-clause which is integrated in the<br />

exception frame (în afară că/să/ except that) will be introduced by că/să/that. We mention that the initial subclauses<br />

impose the selection of one and only one complex preposition which contains the conjunction that<br />

introduces the intial sub-clause. This involves interpreting the complex preposition as a compositional unit.<br />

This will ultimately lead to destructuring the complex preposition into an adverb group (în) afară/except and a<br />

complementizer că/să/that:<br />

(8) În afară că viaţa lui e în pericol nu se mai gândeşte la nimic./He thinks of nothing except that his life is in danger.<br />

(9) În afară să reuşesc la examen, nu îmi doresc nimic.<br />

Instead, when the original syntactic functions inserted in the specialized functional frame, have a predicative<br />

value, we speak of adverbials proper. From a formal point of view, we deal with two predicates and a<br />

complementizer whose embedding value cannot be disregarded. These grammatical constraints which change<br />

the initial formal features generate an adverbial proper whose complement is a CP:<br />

(10) În afară că sunt mîndru, n-am nici un defect./ Except that I am proud, I have no other flaw.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!