Hør dog hvad de siger - Note-to-Self: Trials & Errors

Maynard, D.W., H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen (red.). 2002.
Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview,
New York: Wiley.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of prefer-
red/dispreferred turn shapes, i: J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (red.) Structures of Social Ac-
tion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57-101.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims, Human
Studies 9: 219-229.
Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing Reality, London: Sage.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Oxford: Blackwell.
Stax, Hanne-Pernille. 2000. And then what was the question again? Text and talk in standar-
dised interviews, Proceedings of the 2000 American Statistical Association’s Section on
Survey Research Methods: 913-17.
Stax, Hanne-Pernille. 2005. Når tekst kommer på tale. Studier af interaktion, tekst og opgave-
forståelse i spørgeskemabaserede interview, ph.d.-afhandling ved Institut for Sprog og
Kommunikation, Syddansk Universitet: http://www.humaniora.sdu.dk/phd/ dokumen-
ter/filer/Afhandlinger-50.pdf.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The uses of argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thøgersen, Jacob. under udgivelse. Det er meget godt som det er… er det ikke?.
Wetherell, Margaret. 1998. Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis
and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue, Discourse & Society 9 no. 3: 387-412.
Widdicombe, Sue. 1998. ’But You Don’t Class Yourself’: The Interactional Management of
Category Membership and Non-membership, i C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (red.), Identi-
ties in Talk, London: Sage: 52-70.
245