Hør dog hvad de siger - Note-to-Self: Trials & Errors

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Oakes, Penelope. 2004. The root of all evil in intergroup relations, i M.B. Brewer & M. Hew- stone (red.), Social Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell: 102-19. Operario, D. & S.T. Fiske. 2004. Stereotypes, i M.B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (red.), Social Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell: 120-41. Pedersen, K. B. & L. D. Nielsen. 2001. Kvalitative Metoder – fra metateori til markarbejde, Frederiskberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag. Pennycook, Alastair. 1994. The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language, Harlow: Pearson Education. Phillipson, Robert. 2000. English in the New World Order. Variations on a Theme of Lin- guistic Imperialism and “World” English, i Thomas Ricento (red.), Ideology, Politics and Language Policies. Focus on English, Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 87-119. Phillipson, Robert 2003. English-only Europe? Challenging Language Policy, London: Rout- ledge. Phillipson, Robert. 2006. ”It’s the economy, stupid” (President Clinton) – eller har den sprog- lige mangfoldighed en chance, Sprogforum 36: 4-7. Popper, Karl. 1996. Kritisk rationalisme, 2. oplag, Kbh: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck. Potter, Jonathan. 1996a. Representing Reality, London: Sage. Potter, Jonathan. 1996b. Attitudes, Social Representations and Discursive Psychology, i M. Wetherell (red.), Identities, Groups and Social Issues, London: Sage: 119-73. Potter, Jonathan. 1998. Discursive Social Psychology: From Attitudes to Evaluative Practices, i W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (red.), European Reviews of Social Psychology 9: 233-66. Potter, J. & M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology, London: Sage. Preisler, Bent. 1999a. Danskerne og det engelske sprog, Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitets- forlag. Preisler, Bent. 1999b. Engelsk ovenfra og nedenfra: sprogforandring og kulturel identitet, i N. Davidsen-Nielsen, E. Hansen og P. Jarvad (red.), Engelsk eller ikke engelsk? That is the question, København: Gyldendal: 39-64. Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual Dialechtology. Nonlinguists’ View of Areal Linguistics, Dordrecht: Foris. Preston, Dennis R. 1993. The Uses of Folk Linguistics, International Journal of Applied Lin- guistics 3, no. 2: 181-259. Preston, Dennis R. (red.). 1999. Handbook of Perceptual Dialechology, Philadelphia: John Benjamins 40
Preston, Dennis R. 2004. Folk Metalanguage, i A. Jaworski, N. Coupland & D. Galasiñski, Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Psathas, George. 1989. Phenomenology and Sociology. Theory and research, Boca Raton, FL: Center for advanced research in phenomenology. Psathas, George. 1995. Conversation Analysis. The Study of Talk-in-Interaction, London: Sa- ge. Quist, Pia. 2005. Stilistiske Praksisser i Storbyens Heterogene Skole. En etnografisk og socio- lingvistisk undersøgelse af sproglig variation, upubliceret ph.d.-afhandling, Nordisk Forskningsinstitut, afd. for dialektforskning. Københavns Universitet. Radikale Venstre, det. 2007. Sprogpolitik – et udspil fra det Radikale Venstre, http://www.radikale.dk/public/upload/Filer/DetRadikaleVenstreSprogpolitik.pdf. Rubow, Cecilie. 2000. Hverdagens Teologi. Folkereligiøsitet i danske verdener, København: Anis. Sacks, Harvey. 1972. An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Do- ing Sociology, i David Sudnow (red.), Studies in Social Interaction, New York: The Free Press: 31-73. Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Oxford: Blackwell. Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff & G. Jefferson. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation, Language 50 no. 4: 696-735. Schaeffer, N.C. & D.W. Maynard. 1996. From Paradigm to Prototype and Back Again. Inte- ractive aspects of cognitive processing in standardized survey interviews, i N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (red.), Answering Questions. Methodology for determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 65-88. Schaeffer, Nora Cate. 2002. Conversation with a Purpose – or Conversation? Interaction in the Standardized Interview, i D.W Maynard., H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen (red.). 2002.Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Prac- tice in the Survey Interview, New York: Wiley: 95-123. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1979. Identification and Recognition in Telephone Conversation Ope- nings, i George Psathas (red.), Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnometodology, New York: John Wiley: 23-78. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1986. The Routine as Achievement, Human Studies 9: 111-51. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. Analysing Single Episodes of Interaction: An exercise in Con- versation Analysis, Social Psychology Quarterly 50 no. 2: 101-114. 41
Page 1: Hør dog hvad de siger at undersøg
Page 5 and 6: Indhold Tekst 1: Jacob Thøgersen:
Page 7 and 8: en værdifuld metateori. Jeg vil i
Page 9 and 10: Samtidigt er valget af metateori st
Page 11 and 12: Figur 1: Teorikompleks 11
Page 13 and 14: ne artikulation af oppositioner bas
Page 15 and 16: som ikke har andet tilfælles end a
Page 17 and 18: gelsk som et neutralt verdenssprog
Page 19 and 20: lige nybrud er sket ved at inddrage
Page 21 and 22: henvise til Foucaults magtanalyser
Page 23 and 24: diskuteret og udlagt af informant o
Page 25 and 26: er for stor, den består stort set
Page 27 and 28: Det er også denne trussel der adva
Page 29 and 30: Lægfolk her i undersøgelsen tager
Page 31 and 32: Spørgeskemaundersøgelsen viser et
Page 33 and 34: Med analysen af informanternes folk
Page 35 and 36: Briggs, Charles L. 1984. Learning h
Page 37 and 38: Fuglsang, Martin. 1998. At være p
Page 39: Lazarfeld, Paul F. 1944. The Contro
Page 43 and 44: Wetherell, M. & J. Potter. 1992. Ma
Page 45 and 46: empirical data of this project are
Page 47 and 48: also shed light on the “linguisti
Page 49 and 50: Table 2 Attitudes towards English i
Page 51 and 52: ons and the problem of labels havin
Page 53 and 54: One could raise a crucial critique
Page 55 and 56: One certain exception to this gener
Page 57 and 58: References Bourdieu, Pierre (1991):
Page 59 and 60: INTERVIEWS ER MANGE TING At kalde
Page 61 and 62: sin kritik af det sociolingvistiske
Page 63 and 64: ske interview ses som eksponent for
Page 65 and 66: kunne ligeledes være gode grunde t
Page 67 and 68: uger i stedet for journalisten den
Page 69 and 70: skelle mellem de to retninger. Desu
Page 71 and 72: nacular” defineres som ”that mo
Page 73 and 74: holdningsudtrykkenes væsen. For at
Page 75 and 76: om hvordan de udtrykker sig. Ved at
Page 77 and 78: af de to metoder til noget videnska
Page 79 and 80: afspejling ville vi jo forvente at
Page 81 and 82: ene side den ortodokse CA’s analy
Page 83 and 84: en bizar form for samtale i hvert f
Page 85 and 86: LITTERATUR Albris, J. (1991): ”St
Page 87 and 88: Tekst 4 THE QUEST FOR OBJECTIVITY I
Page 89 and 90: 2.1 Formal standardisation Fowler &
Page 91 and 92:
3. Conversation Analysis The psycho
Page 93 and 94:
‘well that’s because I think En
Page 95 and 96:
exact moment in the conversation. T
Page 97 and 98:
31 sikker på så forstår man hina
Page 99 and 100:
Wolfson supports her claims by show
Page 101 and 102:
The effect of Briggs’ points is t
Page 103 and 104:
word - or rather with a certain mea
Page 105 and 106:
minder of Doris’ poor health or h
Page 107 and 108:
The provocative conclusion that can
Page 109 and 110:
we would never agree to otherwise.
Page 111 and 112:
Heegaard, Jan, Ulrik Hvilshøj & Er
Page 113 and 114:
Begrundelsen for at operere med et
Page 115 and 116:
2. Er resultaterne af E1 og E2 samm
Page 117 and 118:
selvbillede ved at lægge afstand t
Page 119 and 120:
63/37 - 1989: 58/42 - 1999: 52/48 1
Page 121 and 122:
Tabel 3: Kønsforskelle mht. holdni
Page 123 and 124:
varighed (N= 497); gruppen ’høj
Page 125 and 126:
(1) Må jeg lige spørge om noget?
Page 127 and 128:
I samfundet udenfor kan der derimod
Page 129 and 130:
(5) Jeg synes også man skal værne
Page 131 and 132:
5.3 Kønsidentiteten og de konkrete
Page 133 and 134:
6 Konklusion Når spørgsmålet om
Page 135 and 136:
Fishman, Pamela M. 1983. Interactio
Page 137 and 138:
central perspective in our approach
Page 139 and 140:
direction - in fact, Norden has mad
Page 141 and 142:
alization, ‘the ideology of the N
Page 143 and 144:
some 200 informants in the seven No
Page 145 and 146:
derstood the questions and having t
Page 147 and 148:
One very obvious reason why some pe
Page 149 and 150:
Thus, it is understandable that the
Page 151 and 152:
ather cooler view of Scandinavian r
Page 153 and 154:
present in our interpretation of th
Page 155 and 156:
It is not surprising that it is mor
Page 157 and 158:
necessary analyst-awareness of the
Page 159 and 160:
find is indeed that the claim that
Page 161 and 162:
language policies. At the same time
Page 163 and 164:
This stands in implicit opposition
Page 165 and 166:
sion. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertatio
Page 167 and 168:
analyse. Som appendiks findes de en
Page 169 and 170:
Tabel 10.1: Hvem påvirker vores sp
Page 171 and 172:
Denne forståelse er formentlig for
Page 173 and 174:
Til sidst udvikler man måske endda
Page 175 and 176:
Politikere de finder nogle gange p
Page 177 and 178:
Jeg tror meget af den der sprogpåv
Page 179 and 180:
10.2.b Kvalitativt Spørgsmålet om
Page 181 and 182:
sko for at kommunikere internationa
Page 183 and 184:
Der bliver nødt til at være en vi
Page 185 and 186:
de mest nationalistisk indstillede.
Page 187 and 188:
Denne konkrete positivitet kan opsu
Page 189 and 190:
i hvert fald en eller anden basis f
Page 191 and 192:
Jeg tror slet ikke jeg kender den s
Page 193 and 194:
mer når det som her er et spørgsm
Page 195 and 196:
Tekst 8 Coming to terms with Englis
Page 197 and 198:
calized versions of) American youth
Page 199 and 200:
There are several reasons for compl
Page 201 and 202:
I think we delimit many people by h
Page 203 and 204:
does induce unforeseen aspects into
Page 205 and 206:
‘International languages’ - Eng
Page 207 and 208:
Notice how the size of the language
Page 209 and 210:
It is difficult to give a broad est
Page 211 and 212:
On the other hand, if South America
Page 213 and 214:
I believe we should give far more l
Page 215 and 216:
ned, I believe they translate more;
Page 217 and 218:
discussion, e.g. in a question abou
Page 219 and 220:
Human beings are habitual animals.
Page 221 and 222:
of quantitative questionnaires has
Page 223 and 224:
References Aitchison, Jean. 1991. L
Page 225 and 226:
Tekst 9 Pragmatikalisering, neutral
Page 227 and 228:
neutraliseringen af egen holdning,
Page 229 and 230:
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Page 231 and 232:
tyder dog ikke at man nødvendigvis
Page 233 and 234:
lokal. Der er intet der siger, at d
Page 235 and 236:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 237 and 238:
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 10
Page 239 and 240:
Hvis det er svært at finde et enty
Page 241 and 242:
pen for at opnå de to identitetsm
Page 243 and 244:
også selv om intervieweren forment
Page 245 and 246:
Maynard, D.W., H. Houtkoop-Steenstr
Page 247 and 248:
senterer sine resultater abstrakt o
Page 249 and 250:
individer. Man kan mene at det går
Page 251 and 252:
dækker delvis hinanden som et symb
Page 253 and 254:
Klikker man på siden, bliver man s
Page 255 and 256:
English summary During the past hal
Page 257 and 258:
41 C13 K 23 45 min. 21.5.2003 JT 42
Page 259 and 260:
1.5c) Hvilket ord foretrækker du a
Page 261 and 262:
3.6) Det er helt i orden og bare en
Page 263 and 264:
6.6) Hvilke ord bruger du selv? de
Page 265:
Baggrundsspørgsmål Sproglig selvv
show all

Hør dog hvad de siger - Note-to-Self: Trials & Errors

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?