Gewinnung neuer Produktideen durch Anregung von Lieferanten

Literatur 243
Czepiel, J. A. (1975): Patterns of interorganizational communications and the diffusion
of a major technological innovation in a competitive industrial community.
Academy of Management Journal, 18 (1): 6-24.
Dacin, M. T., Hitt, M. A. und Levitas, E. (1997): Selecting partners for successful
international alliances: Examination of U. S. and Korean firms. Journal of World
Business, 32 (1): 3-16.
Das, T. K. und Teng, B.-S. (2000): A Resource-Based theory of strategic alliances.
Journal of Management, 26 (1): 31-62.
Das, T. K. und Teng, B.-S. (2002): The dynamics of alliances conditions in the alliance
development process. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (5): 725-746.
Datamonitor (2005): Build a better mousetrap: 2004 New product innovations of the
Year. www.productscan.com. 17.06.2006.
Day, G. S. (1992): Continuous learning about markets. Strategy and Leadership, 20 (5):
2.
Day, G. S. (2006): Closing the growth gap: Balancing “Big I” and “small i” innovation.
Marketing Science Institute Reports, 6 (4): 3-15.
De Meyer, A. (1999): Using strategic partnerships to create a sustainable competitive
position for hi-tech start-up. R&D Management, 29 (4): 323.
Demsetz, H. (1967): Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review,
57: 347-359.
destatis (2009): Genesis-online, 1997 bis 2007: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland.
https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online;jsessionid
=E9B3B3E0F0D093D36ADFE1237E81390D.tcggen1. 10.11.2009.
Deszca, G., Munro, H. und Noori, H. (1999): Developing breakthrough products:
challenges and options for market assessment. Journal of Operations
Management, Vol. 17: 613-630.
Devlin, G. und Bleakley, M. (1988): Strategic alliances − guidelines for success. Long
Range Planning, Vol. 21: 18-23.
DIN 199: Begriffe im Zeichnungs- und Stücklistenwesen − Stücklisten: DIN.
DIN 55405: Verpackung − Terminologie − Begriffe, Teil 3 und 4. DIN.
Dodgson, M., Gann, D. und Salter, A. (2006): The role of technology in the shift
towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Management, 36
(3): 333.